{"product_id":"105361","title":"unsustainable inequality ","description":"\u003ccenter\u003e\u003cdiv style=\"text-align:center\"\u003e\u003cimg src=\"https:\/\/tmgdisk01.cafe24.com\/images\/vs\/4172\/sv\/3jYHQotGoxj7sXQeYFSTC6KyW70LVV.png?v=1765122828\" style=\"max-width:100%;max-height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\u003ccenter\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"width:95%\"\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"text-align:center;font-size:30px;font-weight:bolder;line-height:1.6em\"\u003e unsustainable inequality \u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"border-bottom:1px;border-bottom-style:dotted;border-color:;padding-bottom:20px\"\u003e\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable align=\"center\" width=\"100%\"\u003e\u003ctbody style=\"border:0px\"\u003e\n\n\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"center\" style=\"line-height:1.2em;text-align:center;font-size:18px;color:black;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:20px;\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\n\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"text-align:center\"\u003e\u003cimg src=\"https:\/\/image.yes24.com\/goods\/118089999\/XL\" style=\"max-width:100%;height:auto\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\n\n\u003c\/tbody\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"width:95%;{split_style6}padding-top:20px;padding-bottom:20px\"\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"text-align:left;font-size:16px;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:20px\"\u003e Description \u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"text-align:left;word-break:break-all;font-size:14px;line-height:1.6em;\"\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003ch5\u003e \u003cb\u003eBook Introduction\u003c\/b\u003e\n\u003c\/h5\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdl\u003e\n\u003cdt\u003e A word from MD\u003c\/dt\u003e\n\u003cdd\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e Until now, economic inequality and environmental crisis have largely been treated as independent issues.\u003cbr\u003e Lucas Chancel, a star French economist who succeeds Thomas Piketty, points out that the two problems are intertwined.\u003cbr\u003e The paradox that the wealthier the carbon footprint, the more secure they are from the climate crisis suggests that economic inequality and climate must be considered together.\u003cbr\u003e - Son Min-gyu, Social and Political PD\u003c\/div\u003e\u003c\/dd\u003e\n\u003c\/dl\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e “For a sustainable society, social and environmental inequality issues must be resolved.\u003cbr\u003e “This book not only shows that these two problems can and must be solved together, but also offers a fresh perspective on the solution.” -Thomas Piketty\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eFinancial Times Book of the Year\u003cbr\u003e Strongly recommended by Thomas Piketty and Bruno Latour\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Economic inequality and the environmental crisis are deeply intertwined!\u003cbr\u003e How can we achieve social justice and environmental justice simultaneously?\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Income and wealth inequality leads to educational inequality and inequality in cultural access, which in turn triggers social division and conflict.\u003cbr\u003e In recent years, worrying situations have emerged in many countries around the world as economic inequality has translated into political polarization and extreme political populism.\u003cbr\u003e Meanwhile, the climate crisis has long been a present tense rather than a future one, with extreme weather events such as heat waves, cold waves, droughts, floods, and wildfires occurring frequently around the globe.\u003cbr\u003e The fact that disasters caused by the climate crisis cause greater suffering to the poor is also confirmed time and time again in reality.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eBut the response to these two huge threats – economic inequality and ecological crisis – has so far been carried out on separate levels.\u003cbr\u003e \"Unsustainable Inequality\" emphasizes that the question of \"how to escape the ecological crisis\" must be addressed alongside the question of \"how to overcome inequality,\" and points out that reducing inequality is the core of the \"ecological transition plan.\"\u003cbr\u003e This book, which is evaluated to combine the quantitative research of an economist with the argumentative sophistication of a philosopher, is being introduced for the first time in Korea in the 2021 revised and expanded edition, which has revised and supplemented the 2017 first edition with the latest data. \u003cbr\u003eLucas Chancel, who has emerged as a world-class star economist by making bold arguments, is working at the World Inequality Institute along with other leading economists including Thomas Piketty and Gabriel Zuckman, and is also a senior advisor to the World Inequality Database (WID.world), a project that builds data to measure wealth inequality.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e When we talk about inequality, we often think of income inequality or asset inequality.\u003cbr\u003e However, environmental inequality is just as serious as socioeconomic inequality, although we are not aware of it.\u003cbr\u003e Chancel traces the deepening of economic inequality since the 20th century and examines its impact on various sectors of society from various angles, then analyzes energy consumption and carbon emissions by income level at the national and continental levels. \u003cbr\u003eThis confirms that economic inequality and environmental destruction create a vicious cycle, which in turn suggests that policies that harmonize the two goals are entirely possible.\u003cbr\u003e Chancel compares and analyzes various social and environmental policies and implementation cases, including progressive tax policies, environmental taxes, large-scale infrastructure improvements, energy cooperatives, and transition village movements, in various countries, to explore ways to create a just and sustainable society.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e You can preview some of the book's contents.\u003cbr\u003e \u003cspan\u003ePreview\u003c\/span\u003e\n\n\u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ul\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003ch5\u003e \u003cb\u003eindex\u003c\/b\u003e\n\u003c\/h5\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e Preface to the Revised and Expanded Edition\u003cbr\u003e Introduction\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cb\u003ePart 1: Economic inequality lies at the heart of unsustainable development.\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Chapter 1: Is Economic Inequality the Reason for Unsustainability?\u003cbr\u003e Chapter 2: Trends and Causes of Economic Inequality\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cb\u003ePart 2: The Vicious Cycle of Social and Environmental Inequality\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Chapter 3: Inequality in Access to Environmental Resources \u003cbr\u003eChapter 4 Inequality of Exposure to Environmental Risks\u003cbr\u003e Chapter 5: Inequality of Responsibility for Pollution\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cb\u003ePart 3: Social and Environmental Policy\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Chapter 6: Limiting Inequality in a Finite World\u003cbr\u003e Chapter 7: Social Struggle vs. International Coordination\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e conclusion\u003cbr\u003e Acknowledgements\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Escape from Economic Inequality and the Ecological Crisis Simultaneously | Kim Byung-kwon\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003ch5\u003e \u003cb\u003eDetailed image\u003c\/b\u003e \u003c\/h5\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cimg src=\"https:\/\/image.yes24.com\/momo\/TopCate4140\/MidCate004\/413935191.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Detailed Image 1\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003ch5\u003e \u003cb\u003eInto the book\u003c\/b\u003e\n\u003c\/h5\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e Environmental destruction is often thought of as a harm that the present generation inflicts on future generations, but it actually deepens social inequality and reinforces existing imbalances within a single generation.\u003cbr\u003e While no one is immune to the risks associated with chemical pollution, such as those in the United States or India, that doesn't mean everyone is exposed to the same risks.\u003cbr\u003e The nature of environmental and economic inequality is virtually a vicious cycle. \u003cbr\u003eIndeed, whether in the global North or the global South, the wealthiest are less exposed to environmental risks (pollution, climate disasters, natural resource price instability, etc.) than the poor.\u003cbr\u003e Moreover, the poor suffer much greater damage from environmental disasters.\u003cbr\u003e This is because the poor have little means to prepare and defend themselves in advance, and little means to recover and get back on their feet after the damage has been done.\u003cbr\u003e We saw such a tragic example vividly when Hurricane Katrina struck New Orleans in 2005.\u003cbr\u003e Rich and poor people did not have the same resilience to environmental damage.\u003cbr\u003e The injustice aggravated by environmental inequality automatically reinforces socioeconomic inequality. \u003cbr\u003eThe deterioration of health due to pollution and the destruction of livelihoods due to environmental disasters push the poorest into even worse conditions, thereby increasing inequality through a phenomenon that can be called the \"environmental poverty trap.\"\u003cbr\u003e Adding to this vicious cycle is the injustice of responsibility for environmental destruction.\u003cbr\u003e It is difficult to say that beyond a certain income level, there is room to reduce pollution.\u003cbr\u003e Although some scholars are raising objections, it is a story that seems to come out of a fairy tale.\u003cbr\u003e With very few exceptions, the wealthiest people generally leave the largest environmental footprints.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e ---From the \"Introductory Note\"\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e As politics becomes more reliant on private donations, candidates who appeal to the wealthy upper class are more likely to win elections.\u003cbr\u003e Thus, the democratic ideal of 'one person, one vote' gradually becomes blurred and becomes 'one dollar, one vote'. \u003cbr\u003eSuch a situation can perpetuate political and economic inequality, and such inequality itself tends to polarize political activity.\u003cbr\u003e According to a fascinating work by three American political scientists, the more inequality there is, the more polarized political life becomes, making it all the more difficult to reduce it.\u003cbr\u003e …even as inequality grows, the wealthiest have no objective reason to support policies that reduce inequality (such policies would require them to pay more in taxes).\u003cbr\u003e Because of this, the US Republican Party's position has shifted to the right.\u003cbr\u003e The three researchers also showed what role immigration has played since the 1970s.\u003cbr\u003e Immigration has greatly increased the number of poor, politically uneducated, or non-voting American citizens.\u003cbr\u003e So it is natural that the political forces opposing redistribution have grown larger than the political forces in favor of it.\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003e---From \"Chapter 1: Is Economic Inequality the Reason for Unsustainability?\"\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e In a world of unequal economic growth, the living standards of low-income earners stagnate, while the incomes of the wealthy increase.\u003cbr\u003e To maintain consumption levels (consumption is one of the driving forces of growth), public authorities encourage lending to low-income households by instilling in them the idea that real estate values ​​will continue to rise.\u003cbr\u003e Meanwhile, the wealthy on the other side of the pyramid lend money to the financial markets that they don't spend (where else would they spend money when they bought three houses and a yacht...) and fuel the real estate bubble and price surge.\u003cbr\u003e But such a surge cannot continue indefinitely, as the ability of low-income households to pay does not actually increase.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e ---From \"Chapter 1: Is Economic Inequality the Reason for Unsustainability?\"\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eThorstein Veblen observed that the more unequal a society becomes, the more people tend to consume conspicuous goods in order to differentiate themselves and keep up with others.\u003cbr\u003e Samuel Bowles and Park Yong-jin showed that the most unequal societies are also those with the longest annual working hours.\u003cbr\u003e Specifically, if inequality in the United States were at the same level as Sweden (according to data from the early 1990s), Americans would work 10 percent fewer hours.\u003cbr\u003e 10 percent is by no means a negligible number.\u003cbr\u003e The two authors explain this result with the 'Veblen effect'.\u003cbr\u003e In an unequal society, people tend to work harder to keep up with the lifestyles of those they envy.\u003cbr\u003e ---From \"Chapter 1: Is Economic Inequality the Reason for Unsustainability?\"\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e The same goes for CO2e emissions resulting from energy consumption. \u003cbr\u003eIn fact, there is a limit to the number of calories we need per day and the amount of fuel we can fill our cars with (even those who own multiple cars cannot drive them all at once).\u003cbr\u003e On the other hand, there is virtually no limit to the amount of goods and services that can be purchased with income.\u003cbr\u003e Luxury cars that sit in their garages all day do not emit CO2e directly, but the CO2e generated by their design and construction must be taken into account when calculating the owner's indirect CO2e emissions.\u003cbr\u003e Therefore, indirect emissions are more closely correlated with income than direct emissions.\u003cbr\u003e The wealthier an individual is, the greater the share of indirect emissions.\u003cbr\u003e French and American citizens, who are in the top 20 percent of income earners, account for three-quarters of their total indirect emissions.\u003cbr\u003e In contrast, in the bottom 20 percent of income earners, indirect emissions account for about two-thirds.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e ---From \"Chapter 5: Inequality of Responsibility for Public Harm\"\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eThe French government attempted to introduce a carbon tax in 2008.\u003cbr\u003e This attempt was never realized and was abandoned due to opposition from both left-wing and right-wing politicians who argued that it was socially unjust.\u003cbr\u003e And a few years later, in 2014, the government of François Hollande finally succeeded in introducing a carbon tax.\u003cbr\u003e Why did one government succeed just a few years later when another failed? The secret is that in the first year of introducing a carbon tax, the rate per ton was close to zero.\u003cbr\u003e Thanks to this, the measure passed unnoticed.\u003cbr\u003e Energy experts and environmentalists praised the Hollande government's clever tactics, believing the carbon tax could be raised gradually over time.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eHow many people would have imagined that such social unrest would occur after that? Carbon taxes were raised as expected, but in the meantime, compensation mechanisms for low-income and middle-class households were not sufficiently established, and no investment was made in the energy transition.\u003cbr\u003e Millions of households have no alternatives to reducing their carbon emissions from transportation or heating.\u003cbr\u003e Raising taxes without financial compensation only fueled their discontent.\u003cbr\u003e Things finally came to a head in 2018.\u003cbr\u003e This is because the Emmanuel Macron government has announced that it will raise the carbon tax as part of its tax reform plan that abolishes the solidarity tax on assets and lowers the tax rate on capital gains.\u003cbr\u003e That year, tax revenues from the top income brackets fell by €4 billion, while the carbon tax, which disproportionately burdens low- and middle-income households, increased by just €4 billion.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eThe French government claimed that the tax system had been reformed to benefit both the environment and low-income earners, but the actual statistics show otherwise.\u003cbr\u003e The top 1 percent saw their incomes rise by more than 6 percent as a result of the tax reform (even the top 0.1 percent saw a 20 percent increase), but the bottom 20 percent ended up paying more in taxes, primarily because of the carbon tax.\u003cbr\u003e\n\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e ---From \"Chapter 6: Reducing Inequality in a Finite World\"\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003ch5\u003e \u003cb\u003ePublisher's Review\u003c\/b\u003e\n\u003c\/h5\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e \u003cb\u003eIs inequality fate?\u003cbr\u003e The Growing Pattern of Economic Inequality as Seen Through Historical Statistics\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eTracing the chronological pattern of inequality based on income and wealth data accumulated since the early 20th century reveals that, barring exceptional circumstances such as war, the Great Depression, or inflation, inequality has been increasing in most countries, both emerging and developed, since the 1980s.\u003cbr\u003e The Kuznets curve, which assumed that a country's income inequality would continue to increase in the early stages of economic development and then decrease as industrialization progressed, is thus refuted.\u003cbr\u003e The decline in inequality observed by Kuznets was not a result of any mechanism, but rather the result of the destruction of capitalist production facilities by the two world wars, the loss of capital by the wealthy by the Great Depression, and the decline in the value of inherited wealth by inflation. \u003cbr\u003eMoreover, immediately after the war, a consensus on social cohesion and solidarity was formed, and tax rates by income bracket were at their highest levels in history, so inequality decreased or stagnated.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Today, economic inequality has a profound impact on all aspects of society.\u003cbr\u003e As private donations increase in political funding, the opinions of the upper-income class are overrepresented, and support for far-right parties from groups with stagnant or low disposable income accelerates the political rightward shift.\u003cbr\u003e Low-income groups are less likely to have access to quality healthcare, which can negatively impact their health, academic performance, and future salary.\u003cbr\u003e Income inequality itself also lowers workers' motivation and thus labor productivity.\u003cbr\u003e This creates a vicious cycle that makes low-income people more socially vulnerable.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eIn analyzing the factors that promote inequality, Chancel points out the weakening of the social state as an organization that shares social risks such as unemployment, disease, and poverty, and the intensive globalization of trade and finance that promotes the explosive growth of upper income and the proliferation of hereditary wealth.\u003cbr\u003e And this ultimately points to a political choice.\u003cbr\u003e This is the result of lowering progressive taxes, neglecting worker protection and education, and deregulating finance.\u003cbr\u003e That choice is often the result of those with capital increasingly exercising political power over public policy, but they can also counter it with other policies.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cb\u003eAre the rich destroying the planet?\u003cbr\u003e The mechanism by which economic inequality causes environmental inequality\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eEnvironmental issues are often linked to the topic of climate change and are often thought of as the harm that the current generation inflicts on future generations, but in reality, they deepen social inequality even within a single generation.\u003cbr\u003e Environmental inequalities manifest themselves in many ways, including inequalities in access to energy, water, and food.\u003cbr\u003e This is often thought of as a regional issue, but it is actually about access to energy for basic cooking and heating, safe drinking water, and quality food.\u003cbr\u003e Exposure to environmental risks is also unequal.\u003cbr\u003e While no one is immune to air pollution from industrial facilities or natural disasters like typhoons and floods, the deterioration of health and the destruction of livelihoods push the poorest into even worse situations, while the wealthy are not only less exposed to risks but are also better prepared and more resilient to the shocks of environmental shocks. \u003cbr\u003eAdding to this vicious cycle is the injustice of responsibility for environmental destruction.\u003cbr\u003e Combining income data with greenhouse gas emissions data, Chancel shows that, both within countries and globally, the top income brackets emit more pollution, and that the top brackets do so overwhelmingly.\u003cbr\u003e In general, the wealthiest people leave the largest environmental footprints, yet they are the least affected by the damage they cause.\u003cbr\u003e Moreover, the 'inequality of policy outcomes' arising from environmental protection policies and the 'inequality of participation in decision-making' to solve ecological problems are also issues that must be addressed.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cb\u003eSolutions for a Sustainable and Equal Society\u003cbr\u003e The Role of Communities, Policies, and International Organizations\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eThe various studies covered in this book clearly demonstrate that sustainable development—such as a healthy democratic society, an efficient functioning economy, and environmental protection—is difficult to achieve unless economic inequality is addressed.\u003cbr\u003e However, the fact that the two goals of reducing inequality and protecting the environment are intertwined and interactive means that both can be pursued simultaneously.\u003cbr\u003e Economic inequality can be mitigated to some extent, even taking environmental constraints into account.\u003cbr\u003e In relation to public policy in particular, Chancel approaches it from three directions.\u003cbr\u003e First, massive investment is needed to transform public services such as energy, water, and public transportation into eco-friendly ones.\u003cbr\u003e Second, we must devise and introduce a tax system that takes the environment into account.\u003cbr\u003e Third, to place environmental inequality at the center of public debate, an open and transparent inequality measurement system must be established.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eIt is interesting that sufficient examples are presented for each claim.\u003cbr\u003e Sweden, which has developed a large-scale urban heating network using renewable energy since the 1970s, Germany, where the energy cooperative management model accounts for nearly half of renewable energy facilities, and the United States, where attempts at privatization of water and sewerage systems have resulted in a return to public ownership, provide an insight into eco-friendly methods that pursue social equity.\u003cbr\u003e Meanwhile, the situation in France, where the yellow vest protests erupted amid growing awareness of tax inequality surrounding the carbon tax hike, shows the limitations of a tax policy that ignores compensation mechanisms. \u003cbr\u003eIf a transparent inequality measurement platform is developed in the near future, it would be most effective to adjust tax rates or actively impose progressive taxes based on the level of responsibility of polluters. However, for now, where such a measurement system is insufficient, one option is to consider applying taxes to consumer goods that simultaneously imply a high standard of living and greenhouse gas emissions.\u003cbr\u003e A good example is the environmental contribution imposed on airline tickets in about ten countries, including France.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Beyond these policy changes, we can seek international solidarity.\u003cbr\u003e Measures to prevent carbon-emitting multinational corporations from using tax havens or to impose sanctions on countries that fail to meet climate goals can only be achieved through consultations among international organizations. \u003cbr\u003eIf these kinds of major changes occur at the local, national, and global levels, we can create the conditions for a just and sustainable future.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e This book unravels the complex relationship between social injustice and environmental damage, and explores the complex nexus they form with economic inequality.\u003cbr\u003e A timely and thought-provoking book during the coronavirus pandemic, when millions have been socially and economically devastated by lockdowns and restrictions on movement.\u003cbr\u003e _Gayathri D.\u003cbr\u003e Naik, LSE Book Review\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Lucas Chancel examines the complex connections between the environment and the socio-economic sphere.\u003cbr\u003e A book that opens the way to a more desirable future.\u003cbr\u003e _『Le Monde』\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e The author mercilessly illuminates the failures of liberal policies.\u003cbr\u003e _『Politis』 \u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"width:95%;padding-top:20px;padding-bottom:20px\"\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"text-align:left;font-size:16px;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:20px\"\u003e GOODS SPECIFICS \u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"text-align:left;font-size:14px;line-height:1.6em;\"\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"width:100%;margin-bottom:5px;line-height:1.6em;font-size:14px\"\u003e - \u003cstrong\u003eDate of issue:\u003c\/strong\u003e April 1, 2023\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n \u003cdiv style=\"width:100%;margin-bottom:5px;line-height:1.6em;font-size:14px\"\u003e- \u003cstrong\u003ePage count, weight, size:\u003c\/strong\u003e 288 pages | 316g | 128*188*20mm\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"width:100%;margin-bottom:5px;line-height:1.6em;font-size:14px\"\u003e - \u003cstrong\u003eISBN13:\u003c\/strong\u003e 9791189722685\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"width:100%;margin-bottom:5px;line-height:1.6em;font-size:14px\"\u003e - \u003cstrong\u003eISBN10:\u003c\/strong\u003e 1189722682 \u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003cspan\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\n\n\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\n\u003c\/center\u003e","brand":"LIBRAIRIE COREENNE","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":43893963784234,"sku":"105361","price":24.0,"currency_code":"EUR","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0683\/2750\/5962\/files\/ecdc2786885f8a57f119081d347c21b4.jpg?v=1765426713","url":"https:\/\/librairie.coreenne.fr\/en\/products\/105361","provider":"LIBRAIRIE COREENNE","version":"1.0","type":"link"}