{"product_id":"105682","title":"The illusion of fairness ","description":"\u003ccenter\u003e\u003cdiv style=\"text-align:center\"\u003e\u003cimg src=\"https:\/\/tmgdisk01.cafe24.com\/images\/vs\/4172\/sv\/3jYHQji42xeWXZ3Hfe2WJRKvXzH8Vz.png?v=1765123633\" style=\"max-width:100%;max-height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\u003ccenter\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"width:95%\"\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"text-align:center;font-size:30px;font-weight:bolder;line-height:1.6em\"\u003e The illusion of fairness \u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"border-bottom:1px;border-bottom-style:dotted;border-color:;padding-bottom:20px\"\u003e\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable align=\"center\" width=\"100%\"\u003e\u003ctbody style=\"border:0px\"\u003e\n\n\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"center\" style=\"line-height:1.2em;text-align:center;font-size:18px;color:black;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:20px;\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\n\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"text-align:center\"\u003e\u003cimg src=\"https:\/\/image.yes24.com\/goods\/94489333\/XL\" style=\"max-width:100%;height:auto\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\n\n\u003c\/tbody\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"width:95%;{split_style6}padding-top:20px;padding-bottom:20px\"\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"text-align:left;font-size:16px;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:20px\"\u003e Description \u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"text-align:left;word-break:break-all;font-size:14px;line-height:1.6em;\"\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003ch5\u003e \u003cb\u003eBook Introduction\u003c\/b\u003e\n\u003c\/h5\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdl\u003e\n\u003cdt\u003e A word from MD\u003c\/dt\u003e\n\u003cdd\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e Michael Sandel Revisits Justice\u003c\/div\u003e  \u003cdiv\u003eIn \"Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do?\" Michael Sandel asks the question of justice again.\u003cbr\u003e Is the \"equality of opportunity and inequality of outcome\" that many modern societies agree on working properly? Michael Sandel argues that meritocracy has reached its limits in the United States.\u003cbr\u003e A person's success is influenced by various factors such as class and education.\u003cbr\u003e Can such a society really be called just?\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e \u003cspan\u003eNovember 20, 2020.\u003c\/span\u003e \u003cspan\u003eSocial and Political PD Son Min-gyu\u003c\/span\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/dd\u003e\n\u003c\/dl\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e \u003cb\u003eMichael Sandel's first new book in over a decade, \"The Illusion of Fairness,\" is out!\u003cbr\u003e Sandel: Dismantling the \"meritocracy trap\" lurking behind our skewed social structure.\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Once again, ‘fairness’ is the topic of conversation.\u003cbr\u003e It is constantly pouring out through the media, from the rich and the poor, from the young and the middle-aged, from politicians. \u003cbr\u003eCompanies are in turmoil over the issue of \"fair hiring,\" stemming from the debate over whether regular or non-regular workers should be considered. Political circles are abuzz with differing interpretations of the \"Three Fair Economy Laws\" and \"Disaster Relief Funds.\"\u003cbr\u003e The president also expressed his difficulties, saying, “One fairness leads to another unfairness.”\u003cbr\u003e In this situation where people from all walks of life are clashing over the single topic of 'fairness', Harvard University Professor Michael Sandel's new book, 'The Illusion of Fairness', written eight years after 'What Money Can't Buy', has been published.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e This book was published in the United States in September 2020 under the original title, 『The Tyranny of Merit: What's Become of the Common Good?』 and has received a hot response.\u003cbr\u003e A direct translation would be 'The Tyranny of Meritocracy: What Really Creates the Common Good?' \u003cbr\u003eIn this book, Sandel argues that “the meritocratic ideal that prioritizes and rewards individual ability, which we have taken for granted as ‘if you work hard, you can succeed,’ is fundamentally and deeply flawed.”\u003cbr\u003e Let's seriously reflect on whether this meritocracy is functioning properly and fairly, and whether the equation 'fairness = justice' is truly correct.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/tbody\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e You can preview some of the book's contents.\u003cbr\u003e \u003cspan\u003ePreview\u003c\/span\u003e\n\n\u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ul\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e \",\"\u003cdiv\u003e\u003ch5\u003e \u003cb\u003eindex\u003c\/b\u003e\n\u003c\/h5\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e \u003cb\u003eIntroduction: College Admissions and Meritocracy\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Ethics in College Admissions | Obtaining Ability Indexes\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cb\u003eCHAPTER 1.\u003cbr\u003e Winners and Losers\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Diagnosing Populist Discontent | 'Technocracy' and Market-Friendly Globalization | How to Plausibly Explain the Inequality Between Rich and Poor | Meritocracy Ethics | The Politics of Humiliation | Technocratic Ability and Organizational Judgment | The Movement of Populism\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cb\u003eCHAPTER 2.\u003cbr\u003e A Short History of Meritocracy: \"Being Good Makes You Great\"\u003c\/b\u003e \u003cbr\u003eWhy Ability Matters | Cosmic Meritocracy | Salvation and Self-Salvation | Providence Past and Present | Wealth and Health | Liberal Providence | The Right Side of History | The Trajectory of the Moral World\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cb\u003eCHAPTER 3.\u003cbr\u003e How to Package Social Ascension into Words\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Hard work and legitimate qualifications | The market and ability | The discourse of self-responsibility | As far as talent and effort allow | Getting what you deserve | The populist counterattack | Is \"If you try, you can do it\" really true? | Seeing and believing\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cb\u003eCHAPTER 4.\u003cbr\u003e The ultimate excuse for bias: academic credentials\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e University Signs Weaponized | Is Education the Answer to Inequality? | Top Talent | Work to Become Smart | Elites Looking Down on the Masses | Degrees Require Governance | The Academic Crack | Technocratic Discourse | Technocracy or Democracy? | Climate Change Debate\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cb\u003eCHAPTER 5.\u003cbr\u003e The Ethics of Success\u003c\/b\u003e \u003cbr\u003eRule of technocrats or rule of aristocracy | The dark side of meritocracy | Rethinking meritocracy | Is a perfect meritocracy just? | Is talent your own? | Does effort create value? | Two alternatives to meritocracy | Rejecting meritocracy | Market and ability | Market value or moral value | Earned qualifications or rights recognized? | Attitudes toward success | Luck and choice | Calculating talent | The rise of meritocracy\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cb\u003eCHAPTER 6.\u003cbr\u003e Universities as 'Talent Selection Machines'\u003c\/b\u003e \u003cbr\u003eThe Meritocracy Coup | The Tyranny of Meritocracy, Slowly Revealing Its Face | Conant's Legacy of Meritocracy | SAT Scores That Follow the Money | Meritocracy Further Strengthens the Foundation of Inequality | Why Elite Universities Fail to Be Engines of Social Mobility | Making Meritocracy Fairer | Talent Selection and the Distribution of Social Presence | Wounded Winners | Climbing Another Burning Ring | Arrogance and Humiliation | The Lottery for Merit | Destroying the Talent Selection Machine | The Hierarchy of Presence | Disciplining Arrogance Based on Ability\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cb\u003eCHAPTER 7.\u003cbr\u003e The dignity of work\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e The Decline of Dignity in Work | Death at the End of Despair | The Causes of Anger | Restoring the Dignity of Work | Work as Social Recognition | Contributory Justice | Let's Debate the Dignity of Work | The Arrogance of the 'Open Agenda' | Finance, Speculation, and the Common Good | Makers and Takers\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cb\u003eConclusion: Competence and the Common Good\u003c\/b\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e \",\"\u003cdiv\u003e\u003ch5\u003e \u003cb\u003eDetailed image\u003c\/b\u003e \u003c\/h5\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cimg src=\"https:\/\/image.yes24.com\/momo\/TopCate3227\/MidCate007\/322663130.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"Detailed Image 1\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e \",\"\u003cdiv\u003e  \u003ch5\u003e\u003cb\u003eInto the book\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/h5\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e [Pride to the winner, humiliation to the loser]\u003cbr\u003e Meritocracy inevitably spreads arrogance to the winners and humiliation to the losers.\u003cbr\u003e The winner attributes his victory to 'my ability'.\u003cbr\u003e I see it as a natural reward for the undeniable achievements I have achieved through my own efforts.\u003cbr\u003e And they start to look down on people who are less successful than them.\u003cbr\u003e And the loser ends up thinking, 'Who should I blame? It's all my fault.'\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e [Will it really necessarily lead to 'justice'?]\u003cbr\u003e Barack Obama held that belief and expressed it often.\u003cbr\u003e He was fond of quoting Martin Luther King, Jr.:\u003cbr\u003e “The trajectory of the moral world is long.\u003cbr\u003e But it must bend toward justice.” He loved this saying so much that after becoming president, he quoted it 33 times in speeches and declarations and even had it engraved on the carpet in his office.\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003e[I came up through my own abilities]\u003cbr\u003e Meritocracy intuitions were widespread across political affiliations.\u003cbr\u003e That intuition has been particularly strong in discussions surrounding affirmative action in college admissions.\u003cbr\u003e Whether students were for or against affirmative action, they believed they had worked hard to get to Harvard and that their status was justified by their abilities.\u003cbr\u003e There was a strong backlash against suggestions that they were admitted due to luck or other uncontrollable factors.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e [Even life is proven by 'wealth', so ability is the shadow of libertarianism]\u003cbr\u003e After reading a recent newspaper article about a Chinese teenager who sold his kidney to buy an iPhone and iPad, I asked my students what they thought about it.\u003cbr\u003e In the ensuing discussion, many students expressed libertarian views. \u003cbr\u003eIf the teenage student had decided to sell his kidney of his own free will, without coercion or threats, there would be no problem.\u003cbr\u003e Some students opposed this position, arguing that it was unfair for the rich to buy kidneys from the poor to extend their lives.\u003cbr\u003e After the lecture, one student gave me an informal answer.\u003cbr\u003e Those who have achieved wealth have proven their ability and therefore deserve to have their lives extended.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e [The underprivileged are not even worthy of help]\u003cbr\u003e Like Reagan, they subtly distinguished between the poor who deserved help and the poor who did not.\u003cbr\u003e Anyone who fought against forces beyond their control was eligible for government assistance.\u003cbr\u003e However, those who were poor due to hardship were not eligible.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e [The only difference is that the targets of prejudice are different: opposing environmental, racial, and gender discrimination, but prejudicing against the less educated] \u003cbr\u003eThe highly educated elite are no less prejudiced than the less educated masses.\u003cbr\u003e “It’s just that the targets of their prejudice are different.” Moreover, elites are not embarrassed about such prejudice.\u003cbr\u003e They may oppose racism and sexism.\u003cbr\u003e However, the prevailing attitude towards prejudice against low-educated people is 'so what?'\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Is social mobility easier in China than in the US?\u003cbr\u003e Let's say you make a bet.\u003cbr\u003e There are two eighteen-year-old boys.\u003cbr\u003e One person lives in China and the other lives in the United States.\u003cbr\u003e Both are poor and the prospects for improvement in their situation are bleak.\u003cbr\u003e Okay, let's pick one of the two boys.\u003cbr\u003e Which one has a better chance of social advancement?\u003cbr\u003e Who did the reader choose?\u003cbr\u003e Until recently, the answer was obvious.\u003cbr\u003e Anyway, “American Dream”. \u003cbr\u003eIn America, it was believed that anyone who worked hard could achieve a better life.\u003cbr\u003e But today the answer is baffling.\u003cbr\u003e China is achieving improvements in individual living standards much faster than the United States.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e [CSAT scores that follow the money]\u003cbr\u003e The SAT is being shown to not be a test that measures innate intelligence, regardless of math ability or socioeconomic background.\u003cbr\u003e Conversely, SAT scores are strongly correlated with the applicant's family wealth.\u003cbr\u003e As you climb higher on the income ladder, your average SAT score goes up.\u003cbr\u003e This gap is particularly large when looking at the scores of students aiming for the most competitive universities.\u003cbr\u003e If you come from a wealthy family (income over $200,000), you have a one in five chance of scoring over 1,400 out of 1,600.\u003cbr\u003e For those from poor families (income less than $20,000 per year), the odds are one in fifty.\u003cbr\u003e High scorers also overwhelmingly have parents who hold college degrees.\u003cbr\u003e\n\n\u003c\/div\u003e  \u003cdiv\u003e--- From the text\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e \",\"\u003cdiv\u003e\u003ch5\u003e \u003cb\u003ePublisher's Review\u003c\/b\u003e\n\u003c\/h5\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e \u003cb\u003eDoes meritocracy work fairly?\u003cbr\u003e And is the equation ‘fairness = justice’ really correct?\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e As time goes by, social mobility becomes more difficult and inequality becomes more entrenched.\u003cbr\u003e While we pursue fairness by valuing individual ability as an inviolable value, why is the situation worsening? In this book, Sandel argues that the \"attitude toward success and failure\" entrenched under meritocracy is causing significant negative consequences in modern society.\u003cbr\u003e He starkly exposes the arrogance that meritocracy breeds among the winners and the harsh standards imposed on those left behind.\u003cbr\u003e Below is a brief summary of the examples of 'aristocratic societies' and 'meritocracy societies' presented by Sandel in his book.\u003cbr\u003e The essence of the problem is compressed.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Let's say there are two countries. \u003cbr\u003eBoth are 'very' unequal in wealth and income (the degree of inequality is the same in both countries).\u003cbr\u003e A society is an aristocracy, and income and wealth depend on the family one is born into and are inherited.\u003cbr\u003e Another society is a meritocratic society.\u003cbr\u003e Inequality of wealth and income is not due to hereditary privilege, but is the result of each person's effort and talent.\u003cbr\u003e Of course, the latter seems more just.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e So, if you were born into a wealthy or poor family and didn't know whether you'd be born into one, which society would you rather be born into? If you were wealthy, the answer would likely be an aristocratic society where you could pass on your wealth to your descendants.\u003cbr\u003e If I were poor, I would prefer a society where people have the opportunity to rise socially through hard work.\u003cbr\u003e But in both cases, there is something to think about in the opposite way. \u003cbr\u003eThe rich in an aristocratic society will recognize that their privileges are 'luck, not achievement,' and the poor will think that their misfortunes are 'bad luck, not my fault.'\u003cbr\u003e Even though life is hard, it's just a matter of 'being born this way', so there's no need to blame yourself and feel inferior.\u003cbr\u003e Conversely, in a meritocratic society, the rich will proudly recognize that their success is \"achievement, not luck,\" while the poor will fall into deep frustration, cursing their own lack of ability and effort.\u003cbr\u003e So, in this situation, which society would you choose? Which society can you be sure is \"better\" (or more just)?\u003cbr\u003e - CHAPTER 5.\u003cbr\u003e Abridged excerpts from The Ethics of Success\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cb\u003eThe true face of meritocracy: arrogance for winners and humiliation for losers.\u003cbr\u003e A paradise for the powerful, exposing the shadows of modern society.\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Sandel also seeks solutions. \u003cbr\u003eI am pondering how to fundamentally overcome the current situation in which the common belief that “you can do it” is being mercilessly shaken.\u003cbr\u003e Basically, it argues that we must acknowledge the fruits of our labor beyond our abilities, show solidarity with a humble mind, and value the dignity of work itself more.\u003cbr\u003e Along with these arguments, Sandel offers several alternatives, the following specific suggestions, particularly in the area of ​​education, are both shocking and ingenious in their conception.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e “Out of 40,000 applicants, we weed out only those who seem unlikely to attend Harvard or Stanford, and those who seem unlikely to get along with their fellow students.\u003cbr\u003e That leaves maybe 30,000, or 25,000, or 20,000 applicants, and whoever passes will likely do well. \u003cbr\u003eThen, rather than going through the extremely difficult and uncertain process of selecting them again, we will select the final successful candidates by drawing lots.\u003cbr\u003e In other words, they throw away their application forms and just pick 2,000 random people.\u003cbr\u003e This alternative does not completely reject meritocracy.\u003cbr\u003e Only those who are capable can pass.\u003cbr\u003e However, rather than seeing it as an ideal that should maximize one's abilities, it is seen only as a condition for passing a certain threshold.\u003cbr\u003e What makes this alternative meaningful is, above all, its practical feasibility.\u003cbr\u003e Even the most savvy admissions officer, no matter how hard they try, would struggle to determine which 18-year-old has the better track record.\u003cbr\u003e Even if we value talent highly, in the context of college admissions, talent becomes a vague and dull concept.\u003cbr\u003e It would probably be easy to identify a math prodigy. \u003cbr\u003e“However, the general assessment of talent is a more complex and less predictable task.”\u003cbr\u003e - CHAPTER 6.\u003cbr\u003e Universities as 'Talent Selection Machines'\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e While making such a \"radical\" proposal, Sandel goes a step further, anticipating counterarguments (such as a decline in academic ability, securing diversity, preferential treatment for alumni and donation-based admissions, and tarnishing the university's reputation) and preparing his own responses.\u003cbr\u003e Readers will experience an unbelievable logical experience where issues they took for granted are shaken out in an unexpected direction.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Not only in education.\u003cbr\u003e Sandel also offers alternatives to work and real life.\u003cbr\u003e He argues that we should \"rethink and debate the dignity of work,\" citing examples such as the income (compensation) gap between casino kings and high school teachers, which are incomparable in terms of social contribution. \u003cbr\u003eIt also suggests that we should challenge the arrogance of competence by acknowledging that 'some areas of life can be determined by luck.'\u003cbr\u003e\n\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e \"]\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"width:95%;padding-top:20px;padding-bottom:20px\"\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"text-align:left;font-size:16px;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:20px\"\u003e GOODS SPECIFICS \u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"text-align:left;font-size:14px;line-height:1.6em;\"\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"width:100%;margin-bottom:5px;line-height:1.6em;font-size:14px\"\u003e - \u003cstrong\u003eDate of issue:\u003c\/strong\u003e December 1, 2020\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"width:100%;margin-bottom:5px;line-height:1.6em;font-size:14px\"\u003e - \u003cstrong\u003ePage count, weight, size:\u003c\/strong\u003e 420 pages | 764g | 153*224*30mm\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"width:100%;margin-bottom:5px;line-height:1.6em;font-size:14px\"\u003e - \u003cstrong\u003eISBN13:\u003c\/strong\u003e 9791164136452\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"width:100%;margin-bottom:5px;line-height:1.6em;font-size:14px\"\u003e - \u003cstrong\u003eISBN10:\u003c\/strong\u003e 1164136453 \u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003cspan\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\n\n\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\n\u003c\/center\u003e","brand":"LIBRAIRIE COREENNE","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":43893970698282,"sku":"105682","price":30.0,"currency_code":"EUR","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0683\/2750\/5962\/files\/5cde24eef2eb4895d5d60fe47c64abb4.jpg?v=1765427204","url":"https:\/\/librairie.coreenne.fr\/en\/products\/105682","provider":"LIBRAIRIE COREENNE","version":"1.0","type":"link"}