{"product_id":"105741","title":"The Age of Anti-Intellectualism ","description":"\u003ccenter\u003e\u003cdiv style=\"text-align:center\"\u003e\u003cimg src=\"https:\/\/tmgdisk01.cafe24.com\/images\/vs\/4172\/sv\/3jYHQorj2WJuk5zRSmuF9p3SelBolZ.png?v=1765123905\" style=\"max-width:100%;max-height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\u003ccenter\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"width:95%\"\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"text-align:center;font-size:30px;font-weight:bolder;line-height:1.6em\"\u003e The Age of Anti-Intellectualism \u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"border-bottom:1px;border-bottom-style:dotted;border-color:;padding-bottom:20px\"\u003e\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable align=\"center\" width=\"100%\"\u003e\u003ctbody style=\"border:0px\"\u003e\n\n\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"center\" style=\"line-height:1.2em;text-align:center;font-size:18px;color:black;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:20px;\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\n\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"text-align:center\"\u003e\u003cimg src=\"https:\/\/image.yes24.com\/goods\/90977527\/XL\" style=\"max-width:100%;height:auto\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\n\n\u003c\/tbody\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"width:95%;{split_style6}padding-top:20px;padding-bottom:20px\"\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"text-align:left;font-size:16px;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:20px\"\u003e Description \u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"text-align:left;word-break:break-all;font-size:14px;line-height:1.6em;\"\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003ch5\u003e \u003cb\u003eBook Introduction\u003c\/b\u003e\n\u003c\/h5\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdl\u003e\n\u003cdt\u003e A word from MD\u003c\/dt\u003e\n\u003cdd\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e Many have pointed to American anti-intellectualism as the reason for the election of President Trump, who has been criticized for his hate speech and irrational behavior.\u003cbr\u003e This book argues that anti-intellectualism is not a recent phenomenon.\u003cbr\u003e We trace the origins and reality of anti-intellectualism that has driven America since its founding.\u003cbr\u003e - Son Min-gyu, Social and Political MD\u003c\/div\u003e\u003c\/dd\u003e\n\u003c\/dl\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e \u003cb\u003eA problematic work that predicted the Trump era\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e \u003cbr\u003eAmerica's anti-intellectual culture ultimately gave birth to Trump.\u003cbr\u003e A 21st-century version of the classic Western intellectual history, American Anti-Intellectualism.\u003cbr\u003e The book that most vividly portrays America today\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e How Religious Fundamentalism and Infotainment Culture Ruined America\u003cbr\u003e What will we do in the age of post-truth and fake news?\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e The Trump era is not over yet.\u003cbr\u003e His unprecedentedly ignorant and outrageous words and actions have earned him shunning even from the conservative right, and there's a strong prediction that he'll lose the next presidential election. But who knows? Could another upset unfold like in 2016?\u003cbr\u003e But the bigger problem is that Trump won't be the last.\u003cbr\u003e Twelve years ago, George W.\u003cbr\u003e Just like Bush did.\u003cbr\u003e In the 21st century, America is likely to call for a second Bush or a second Trump at any time.\u003cbr\u003e The general theory that history repeats itself is not enough. \u003cbr\u003eThe book's central argument is that something lurks beneath the surface that cannot be explained simply by voters' periodic desire for regime change, and that it must be sought in the long-term, persistent trends that have driven the United States since its founding.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \"The Age of Anti-Intellectualism\" is a critique of civilization that vividly highlights the enormous tectonic shifts created by the clash between the two major axes of rational enlightenment and religious fundamentalism over the past 200 years since the nation's founding, and is a scathing social critique of the fundamental crisis that modern America has faced as a result.\u003cbr\u003e It is also a cultural study that reveals why so many ordinary Americans support Trump.\u003cbr\u003e It awakens us to the urgent task of awakened intellectuals in the current climate of post-truth, fake news, and junk science, a departure from the great traditions of American intellectual history.\u003cbr\u003e\n\n\u003c\/div\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e You can preview some of the book's contents. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePreview\u003c\/span\u003e\n\n\u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ul\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003ch5\u003e \u003cb\u003eindex\u003c\/b\u003e\n\u003c\/h5\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e Introduction: The Resurgence of Powerful Anti-Intellectualism\u003cbr\u003e Chapter 1: How We Live Today: The Story of Our Common People\u003cbr\u003e Chapter 2: How We Lived Then: Intelligence and Ignorance in a New Nation\u003cbr\u003e Chapter 3: Social Pseudoscience in the Early Years of America's Culture Wars\u003cbr\u003e Chapter 4: Reds, Leftists, and Sympathizers\u003cbr\u003e Chapter 5: Middlebrow Culture, from its heyday to its decline\u003cbr\u003e Chapter 6: Blaming the 1960s\u003cbr\u003e Chapter 7 Legacies: Youth Culture and Celebrity Culture\u003cbr\u003e Chapter 8: The New Appearance of Old Religions\u003cbr\u003e Chapter 9: Junk Thought and Junk Science\u003cbr\u003e Chapter 10: The Culture of Distraction\u003cbr\u003e Chapter 11: Public Life: Setting the Bar for Idiocy Lower and Lower\u003cbr\u003e Conclusion: What to Do in an Age of Amnesia and Post-Truth\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Acknowledgements\u003cbr\u003e main\u003cbr\u003e Selected References\u003cbr\u003e Translator's Note\u003cbr\u003e Search\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003ch5\u003e \u003cb\u003eInto the book\u003c\/b\u003e\n\u003c\/h5\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e  \u003cdiv\u003eThe book was first published in hardcover by Pantheon Press in the winter of 2008, when a young senator with the unusual name of Barack Hussein Obama and an older senator named Hillary Rodham Clinton were tackling the snowy fields of New Hampshire in their quest for the Democratic presidential nomination.\u003cbr\u003e I thought that either Obama or Clinton would be better than Bush, as I believe that rationality and respect for knowledge are important qualifications for a president.\u003cbr\u003e But I see no reason to change the generally pessimistic argument contained in the preface to the first edition.\u003cbr\u003e There I argued that it was difficult to suppress the fear that “the scales of American history have tilted significantly against the vibrant and colorful life essential to a functioning democracy.” \u003cbr\u003eThe Bush administration's perceived tendency toward anti-intellectualism was less a function of Bush's personal failings than of a general process of lowering the bar for stupidity in American culture since the 1970s.\u003cbr\u003e --- p.10~11\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e The reason I've always taken Trump so seriously is that, while rereading Hofstadter's book and doing research for this book, Trump seemed to me not just a deviant, but an anti-intellectual candidate who exhibited easily recognizable patterns.\u003cbr\u003e When he publicly revealed his ambition to trade management of his personal brand for management of the American brand, Hofstadter's warning lingered in my mind:\u003cbr\u003e “There is a possibility that various paths of choice may be blocked.\u003cbr\u003e “The culture of the future may be dominated solely by those who are devoted to a particular creed.”\u003cbr\u003e --- p.13\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eThe adjective \"unprecedented\" often used to describe Trump's presidential bid is only half true.\u003cbr\u003e Trump is unprecedented only in the sense that he is the first president to have never served in government or the military.\u003cbr\u003e In other respects, he is part of a broader phenomenon of economic resentment and anti-intellectualism that is by no means unprecedented in early or modern American history.\u003cbr\u003e What Trump had (and still has) is access to social media, which has unprecedented reach and influence.\u003cbr\u003e Facebook and Twitter, which were in their infancy in the early years of this century, had by 2015 grown into expansive and effective tools for Trump to attack public discourse in a way that everyone could understand. \u003cbr\u003eIf I had predicted in 2008 how quickly social media would expand and how effectively it could disseminate factually unsubstantiated opinions to the public, I might have recognized the Trump we would soon see, or someone like him.\u003cbr\u003e --- p.22\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e There is considerable evidence that Americans have become increasingly reluctant to regard reason as a virtue, whether by applying strict standards of truth and logic to what they see and hear on social media or by deliberately turning a blind eye to scientific research-based expertise in decisions about war and peace.\u003cbr\u003e To give one example, among developed countries, Americans are the only ones who view evolution by natural selection as \"controversial\" rather than established mainstream science. \u003cbr\u003eThe continued strength of religious fundamentalism in the United States (also unique among developed nations) is usually cited as the sole reason for the curious persistence of opposition to evolution.\u003cbr\u003e But such a simple answer alone doesn't address the larger question of why so many Americans, even non-fundamentalists, readily dismiss scientific consensus.\u003cbr\u003e A more realistic and complex explanation cannot be found in religious fundamentalism alone, or even around it, but must be sought in the low level of public knowledge about science in general and evolution in particular.\u003cbr\u003e --- p.27~28\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e America now suffers from a disease that is a mixture of ignorance, anti-rationalism, and anti-intellectualism, which, combined with science and technology, has mutated into something far more dangerous than ever before.\u003cbr\u003e The disease that has developed in this way is paradoxically inextricably linked to an attitude of indifference, an attitude of indifference to [dissent], which is both aggressive and passive. \u003cbr\u003eThis state of affairs is aggressively promoted by everyone from politicians to media executives whose livelihoods depend on citizens seeking their opinions on sound bites and blogs, and passively accepted by a nation captivated by the snake that promises effortless infotainment if you eat the fruit of the Twitter tree.\u003cbr\u003e Is there still time left to ameliorate the decadent effects of that poisoned apple? And do cultural preservationists have the will to do so? As long as we continue to strive to bring that will to the judgment of history, people will live in the unwavering hope that it will happen.\u003cbr\u003e --- p.32~33\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e It is impossible to define anti-intellectualism as a historical force or an enduring American reality in the same precise or useful way as abolitionism or feminism. \u003cbr\u003eIn Hofstadter's view, anti-intellectualism is not an independent historical or social phenomenon, but the result of some other goal (such as the desire to expand educational opportunities to more people, or to regain control of religious life from the church's ruling elite).\u003cbr\u003e Hofstadter wrote:\u003cbr\u003e “No one thinks that they are going against ideology and culture.\u003cbr\u003e No one wakes up in the morning, looks in the mirror, smiles, and says, 'Okay, today I'm going to torture intellectuals and strangle ideology!'\" I think that's a bit too lenient a description of anti-intellectualism.\u003cbr\u003e Even then and now, only a very small number of people consider themselves enemies of ideology and culture (or of ideology and culture as they define it).\u003cbr\u003e But what public figures actually do in relation to culture is far more important than what they say in front of the mirror.\u003cbr\u003e --- p.46~47\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eWhat explains the powerful pull of Americans toward values ​​that seem so at odds not only with intellectual modernism and science, but also with the age-old Enlightenment rationalism that so fundamentally shaped this nation's founding? Any attempt to answer this question must begin by considering the self-contradictory cultural and political forces that shaped the idea of ​​American exceptionalism before the nation itself existed and became a vital component of the young republic's formative decades of experimentation.\u003cbr\u003e Many of these forces, while deeply revering scholarship, were deeply suspicious of excessive learning, and they mutated into the irrational present generation through economic and demographic changes that first-generation Americans could not have imagined.\u003cbr\u003e\n\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e --- p.76\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003ch5\u003e \u003cb\u003ePublisher's Review\u003c\/b\u003e\n\u003c\/h5\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e \u003cb\u003eA problematic work that predicted the era of Trumpism and post-truth.\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eWhen the author first wrote this book, he had George W.\u003cbr\u003e It was Bush.\u003cbr\u003e The author views the eight years during which Bush was president as the height of anti-intellectualism and anti-rationalism in modern American political history.\u003cbr\u003e The Bush administration's perceived tendency toward anti-intellectualism was less a function of Bush's personal failings than of a general process of lowering the bar for stupidity in American culture since the 1970s.\u003cbr\u003e And when the first edition of this book was published (in 2008), the progressive Obama was in the midst of a campaign to prevent the Republican Party from remaining in power for a long time.\u003cbr\u003e At the time, Trump was still a member of the Democratic Party, and Twitter had only about a million users.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eBut it was hardly surprising to the author that eight years later, the crisis of American democracy he had diagnosed was recurring once again, or even worse, in its worst form.\u003cbr\u003e Rather, he even predicted that Trump might be elected.\u003cbr\u003e Writing the revised edition wasn't that difficult either.\u003cbr\u003e All that was needed was to add the influence of Trump and the growing influence of social media (Twitter had over 317 million users in 2016).\u003cbr\u003e This book became a hot topic among American intellectuals who were shocked by the emergence of the most anti-intellectual president in American history, a stark contrast to Obama, as it provided a clue to understanding this unbelievable reality, and it was praised as a 21st-century version of Richard Hofstadter's American Anti-Intellectualism, a classic of Western intellectual history, and became one of the most important bestsellers of that year. \u003cbr\u003eBecause it starkly exposed the anti-intellectual culture in America that led to Trump's election.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Considering that Korea has been baptized by the United States in virtually every aspect, including politics, economics, history, religion, and culture, this book, which traces the irrationality and anti-scientific nature that pervades American society, holds significant implications for us as well.\u003cbr\u003e In particular, the fake news churned out by conservative YouTubers, the political rise of fundamentalist Protestant forces, and the incitement of hatred against social minorities are strikingly similar to our reality.\u003cbr\u003e According to an estimate by a theologian (Kim Jin-ho), about 40% of the power elite in Korean society are Protestants, and they have already made great contributions to the creation and maintenance of two consecutive far-right regimes under the names of 'Kosoyoung' (Korea University, Somang Church, Yeongnam) and 'Samija' (Sarang Church, Research Group for Managing the Future). \u003cbr\u003eThis is why the contents of this book, which traces the impact of religious fundamentalism, which promotes anti-rationalism and anti-intellectualism, on the nation and society, cannot be dismissed as a foreign issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cb\u003eThe revival of powerful religious fundamentalism that dreams of a new political order\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e “For a civilized nation to expect its people to be ignorant and yet free is to expect something that never was, and never will be.” When Thomas Jefferson said this in 1816, at the dawn of the nation’s founding, he could not have imagined that America would still be struggling with this dilemma two centuries later. \u003cbr\u003eThe grand Enlightenment ideals of the Founders led the United States, once a colony of European civilization, to become the world's most powerful nation. However, the religious fundamentalists' desire to establish a Christian nation in the New World also strongly motivated many Americans, making the United States the most religious nation among the world's advanced nations.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e The author points to the resurgence of religious fundamentalism as the greatest driving force behind the proliferation of anti-intellectualism and anti-rationalism in the United States over the past 40 years.\u003cbr\u003e Religious fundamentalism, which opposes most of the great rationalist insights that have transformed Western civilization since the dawn of the Enlightenment, is based on a willing ignorance, as is starkly demonstrated in the battle between evolution and creationism.\u003cbr\u003e Among developed countries, the United States is the only country where many people still view evolution as \"controversial\" rather than established mainstream science. \u003cbr\u003eAnti-intellectualism in America has deepened as the path of fundamentalism, which rejects secular knowledge and learning that conflicts with the Bible, has blocked the path of rational Christianity, which seeks to reconcile rationalism and Christian faith.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e A 2006 Pew Forum research survey asked the following question:\u003cbr\u003e \"Which should have the most important influence on American law? The Bible or the will of the people? When the will of the people conflicts with the Bible, which should prevail?\" A staggering 60 percent of white evangelicals answered the Bible, not the will of the people.\u003cbr\u003e Among those who held that view, 16 percent were white mainline Protestants, 23 percent were Catholics, and 7 percent considered themselves secular.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e In a democratic society, the Bible should be upheld, not the will of the people! This is the problem. \u003cbr\u003eOne of the key differences between the past and present in the revival of fundamentalism is that modern right-wing fundamentalists believe it is their religious duty to take sides in politics and institutionalize their moral values.\u003cbr\u003e Journalist Bill Moyers warned of the dangers:\u003cbr\u003e “One of the biggest changes that has happened in politics in my lifetime is that such delusions are no longer peripheral.\u003cbr\u003e It went from the fringes to the mainstream, occupying the Oval Office and the seats of power in Congress.\u003cbr\u003e For the first time in our history, ideology and theology monopolize power in Washington.”\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eThey are not just a right-wing party bastion, but are also deeply involved in secular politics, training right-wing warriors through ultra-conservative Christian colleges (for example, classes at Patrick Henry College were canceled for days before the 2004 presidential election because too many students were working on Bush's re-election campaign), and even forming close alliances with right-wing Catholics who tout their commitment to papal infallibility and to abortion, homosexuality, premarital sex, and contraception.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e \u003cb\u003eAnti-rationalism and anti-intellectualism are addicted to infotainment, junk ideas and junk science,\u003cbr\u003e And it thrives when mixed with a poor education system.\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Regardless of political stance, two key components of American anti-intellectualism and anti-rationalism have remained largely unchanged since the 1890s. \u003cbr\u003eOne is the belief that intellectualism and secular higher education are staunch enemies of faith.\u003cbr\u003e The romantic myth of the early autodidact, associated with the idea of ​​\"rugged individualism,\" has often been used to attack the idea that education is a legitimate government duty.\u003cbr\u003e Moreover, the negative image created by the right wing by linking liberalism and communism during the McCarthy era and the rebellious 1960s gave rise to contempt and rejection of the elite (commonly known as \"eggheads\").\u003cbr\u003e And the resurgence of religious fundamentalism since the 1960s has had a detrimental effect on public education in many areas, which is one reason why American high school students have less scientific knowledge than their peers in Europe and Asia. \u003cbr\u003eAnother is the poison of pseudoscience, which traces its origins to Social Darwinism, which attempted to rationalize the excessive wealth and poverty of the Gilded Age by applying Darwin's theory of evolution to the social sphere during the early stages of the culture war surrounding the theory of evolution.\u003cbr\u003e This led to the bastion of eugenics until World War II, to Ayn ​​Rand's \"objectivist\" philosophy in the tumultuous mid-20th century, and more recently to the cult of the market economy and all sorts of junk science.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e The author points to the rapid transition from print culture to visual culture (infotainment culture) as another driving force that has amplified anti-intellectualism in the United States over the past 40 years.\u003cbr\u003e The reason the 1960s are important in American intellectual history is because they show the beginning of the decline of print culture due to visual culture. \u003cbr\u003eThe voluntary attention that print demands is the antithesis of the reflexive distraction that infotainment media encourages—whether it's music on your iPod, flashy images on a homepage, text messages, video games, or the latest in \"reality\" TV.\u003cbr\u003e The decline in the ability to subjectively accept and judge the overflow of information reinforces public ignorance about science and religion.\u003cbr\u003e More than two-thirds of Americans don't know that DNA is the key to unlocking their genetics.\u003cbr\u003e Nine out of ten people do not understand radiation and what it can do to the human body.\u003cbr\u003e One in five adults is convinced that the sun revolves around the Earth.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e In 2001, less than half of American adults had read even one novel or book of poetry.\u003cbr\u003e Only 57 percent of Americans have read even one nonfiction book. \u003cbr\u003eThese responses point to the alarming failure of public education in primary and secondary schools, and illustrate why the public either cannot or will not understand scientists' warnings about evolution or climate change.\u003cbr\u003e This also explains why voters did not judge Trump for dismissing global warming as a hoax.\u003cbr\u003e The more Trump mocked the experts, the more he endeared himself to his supporters.\u003cbr\u003e This is the biggest reason why Americans elected the man who currently occupies the White House with a culture of lies.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e Anti-intellectualism thrives on the ignorance of the masses.\u003cbr\u003e The author strongly appeals that public intellectuals have a responsibility to collaborate to awaken the intellectual laziness of the public, who are addicted to an infotainment culture that obscures and conceals the truth, and to create an era of post- and post-truth. \u003cbr\u003e\n\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"width:95%;padding-top:20px;padding-bottom:20px\"\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"text-align:left;font-size:16px;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:20px\"\u003e GOODS SPECIFICS \u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"text-align:left;font-size:14px;line-height:1.6em;\"\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"width:100%;margin-bottom:5px;line-height:1.6em;font-size:14px\"\u003e - \u003cstrong\u003eDate of issue:\u003c\/strong\u003e July 6, 2020\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n \u003cdiv style=\"width:100%;margin-bottom:5px;line-height:1.6em;font-size:14px\"\u003e- \u003cstrong\u003ePage count, weight, size:\u003c\/strong\u003e 528 pages | 650g | 149*223*35mm\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"width:100%;margin-bottom:5px;line-height:1.6em;font-size:14px\"\u003e - \u003cstrong\u003eISBN13:\u003c\/strong\u003e 9791190422369\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003cdiv style=\"width:100%;margin-bottom:5px;line-height:1.6em;font-size:14px\"\u003e - \u003cstrong\u003eISBN10:\u003c\/strong\u003e 1190422360 \u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\n\u003c\/div\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003ccenter\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd style=\"height:10px\"\u003e\u003c\/td\u003e\u003c\/tr\u003e\u003c\/table\u003e\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\u003cspan\u003e\u003c\/span\u003e\n\n\u003c\/center\u003e\n\n\n\u003c\/center\u003e","brand":"LIBRAIRIE COREENNE","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":43893973712938,"sku":"105741","price":34.0,"currency_code":"EUR","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0683\/2750\/5962\/files\/1fa093cd73123623d65668ae3267d2d3.jpg?v=1765427382","url":"https:\/\/librairie.coreenne.fr\/en\/products\/105741","provider":"LIBRAIRIE COREENNE","version":"1.0","type":"link"}