
The art of delegating tasks clearly rather than telling others to do it themselves
Description
Book Introduction
Narrow down the illusion that you know!
Making even the most incompetent team members work efficiently
What does the leader say?
▶ How much feedback should I give to my juniors?
▶ Do you want to open up the voices of team members who are not speaking up?
▶ How can we change the regular meetings that proceed like inertia?
▶ Is there a way to create a system for rambling reports?
▶ When the leader's words change, 'real' work begins!
A new book from Daichi Kogure, the bestselling author with 1.95 million copies!
A new book by Daichi Kogure, author of “How to Explain Accurately Without Rambling” (Galmae Namu), has been published.
Like its predecessor, which established itself as a steady seller in the domestic public speaking field with concrete examples and practical solutions, this book, "The Art of Delegating Clearly, Not Doing It Yourself," also organizes the author's know-how, established through over 3,000 cumulative cases of verbal consulting, including situations he personally experienced as a leader, in a way that can be seen at a glance.
"Are my work instructions ambiguous? Why don't they understand?" Anyone in a position to delegate work has likely asked these questions at least once.
When I see team members doing something wrong even though I clearly explained it correctly, or not accepting what I say by saying, "Do this," and saying, "I'm already doing it," I think, "Was my explanation lacking?" but at the same time, I also think, "You have to learn to think for yourself to grow."
So the feedback becomes even more ambiguous.
“Please make it more persuasive.” “Can you offer a fresh perspective?” “Please improve the accuracy of your work.”
Just as the phrase '알잘탁칼센 (knowing things well, neatly, and with good sense)' was once popular on the Internet, our society wants people who 'know things well' without having to explain them in detail.
The author, who brought about a revolution by raising the need for clear 'verbalization' in Japanese culture, where vagueness is considered polite, also felt at a loss when he saw a team member who was underperforming in his younger days.
Because I secretly thought that if I could do it, my teammates would be able to do it too without me having to say anything.
I felt my incompetence as a leader deeply, and although I put into practice what I learned from leadership books and seminars, the situation did not change.
This is because common solutions such as motivating team members, asking them about their difficulties, and increasing psychological safety did not address the root of the problem.
The essence of the problem was 'ambiguous work instructions', or 'the leader's words'.
Making even the most incompetent team members work efficiently
What does the leader say?
▶ How much feedback should I give to my juniors?
▶ Do you want to open up the voices of team members who are not speaking up?
▶ How can we change the regular meetings that proceed like inertia?
▶ Is there a way to create a system for rambling reports?
▶ When the leader's words change, 'real' work begins!
A new book from Daichi Kogure, the bestselling author with 1.95 million copies!
A new book by Daichi Kogure, author of “How to Explain Accurately Without Rambling” (Galmae Namu), has been published.
Like its predecessor, which established itself as a steady seller in the domestic public speaking field with concrete examples and practical solutions, this book, "The Art of Delegating Clearly, Not Doing It Yourself," also organizes the author's know-how, established through over 3,000 cumulative cases of verbal consulting, including situations he personally experienced as a leader, in a way that can be seen at a glance.
"Are my work instructions ambiguous? Why don't they understand?" Anyone in a position to delegate work has likely asked these questions at least once.
When I see team members doing something wrong even though I clearly explained it correctly, or not accepting what I say by saying, "Do this," and saying, "I'm already doing it," I think, "Was my explanation lacking?" but at the same time, I also think, "You have to learn to think for yourself to grow."
So the feedback becomes even more ambiguous.
“Please make it more persuasive.” “Can you offer a fresh perspective?” “Please improve the accuracy of your work.”
Just as the phrase '알잘탁칼센 (knowing things well, neatly, and with good sense)' was once popular on the Internet, our society wants people who 'know things well' without having to explain them in detail.
The author, who brought about a revolution by raising the need for clear 'verbalization' in Japanese culture, where vagueness is considered polite, also felt at a loss when he saw a team member who was underperforming in his younger days.
Because I secretly thought that if I could do it, my teammates would be able to do it too without me having to say anything.
I felt my incompetence as a leader deeply, and although I put into practice what I learned from leadership books and seminars, the situation did not change.
This is because common solutions such as motivating team members, asking them about their difficulties, and increasing psychological safety did not address the root of the problem.
The essence of the problem was 'ambiguous work instructions', or 'the leader's words'.
- You can preview some of the book's contents.
Preview
index
Entering “Why can’t I do as I’m told?” vs “So what should I do?”
Chapter 1: Nothing Changes by Order: The Verbalization of 'Leadership'
Don't talk in a directional way
How to define the difference between 'goal' and 'current situation'
The Secret to Higher Performance in the Same Time
Forget the saying "look over your shoulder"
Chapter 2: No Employee Does Itself: The Verbalization of "Management"
The key to business growth is vision, action, and communication.
How to improve execution accuracy
Why a Sales Beginner Could Generate 100 Million Won in Monthly Sales
“What is being said?” is better than “Who is speaking?”
The delusion that psychological safety increases team effectiveness
Let today's to-do list lead to results
Vague measures solve nothing.
Reduce the time spent wondering what to do
Chapter 3: A Framework for Translating Vague Vision into Action: The Verbalization of "Goals"
The ambiguity hidden in "making a project a success"
Two Steps to Defining a Vision That's Just Words
“I don’t understand what the boss is talking about.”
We will design the 'intermediate stage' closely.
Having a 'framework' of thought gives you confidence in your speech.
Answering “Does that make sense?”
Beyond what is necessary
Chapter 4: If You're Worried About Neglect and Micromanagement: Verbalizing "Instructions"
Why arbitrary interpretations arise
Why can't we think and act for ourselves?
I worked hard, so why didn't I get anything?
If you are wondering how far you should direct work,
Repeat 'What should I do then?' three times.
How do I say 'accurate' feedback?
Criteria for judging whether something is truly necessary
Three Ways to Correct a Wrong Orbit
Clearly communicate the level of completion you desire.
Chapter 5: The Art of Drawing Out Team Members' Thoughts: Verbalizing "Questions"
Questions to organize vague feelings into business terms
Team members who don't say anything, team members who insist on their own opinions
Think in advance about what kind of answer you want to hear
It's good to use examples appropriately.
What's Hidden Behind Words and Silence
A Leader's Questions That Get You to Say the Hard Things
The Truth About Embracing Diversity
How to Get Rid of That Anxious 'Feeling'
Chapter 6: Narrowing the Illusion of "Knowing": The Verbalization of "Communication"
What does 'easy to understand' mean?
If you touch my 'emotions', I'll agree
Delivering the 'numbers' first, not the conclusion.
A technology that allows even team members who can't explain things to report clearly
Narrow the gap in interpretation that arises from 'good intentions'
Correcting unconscious choices
As times change, the role of leaders must also change.
Chapter 1: Nothing Changes by Order: The Verbalization of 'Leadership'
Don't talk in a directional way
How to define the difference between 'goal' and 'current situation'
The Secret to Higher Performance in the Same Time
Forget the saying "look over your shoulder"
Chapter 2: No Employee Does Itself: The Verbalization of "Management"
The key to business growth is vision, action, and communication.
How to improve execution accuracy
Why a Sales Beginner Could Generate 100 Million Won in Monthly Sales
“What is being said?” is better than “Who is speaking?”
The delusion that psychological safety increases team effectiveness
Let today's to-do list lead to results
Vague measures solve nothing.
Reduce the time spent wondering what to do
Chapter 3: A Framework for Translating Vague Vision into Action: The Verbalization of "Goals"
The ambiguity hidden in "making a project a success"
Two Steps to Defining a Vision That's Just Words
“I don’t understand what the boss is talking about.”
We will design the 'intermediate stage' closely.
Having a 'framework' of thought gives you confidence in your speech.
Answering “Does that make sense?”
Beyond what is necessary
Chapter 4: If You're Worried About Neglect and Micromanagement: Verbalizing "Instructions"
Why arbitrary interpretations arise
Why can't we think and act for ourselves?
I worked hard, so why didn't I get anything?
If you are wondering how far you should direct work,
Repeat 'What should I do then?' three times.
How do I say 'accurate' feedback?
Criteria for judging whether something is truly necessary
Three Ways to Correct a Wrong Orbit
Clearly communicate the level of completion you desire.
Chapter 5: The Art of Drawing Out Team Members' Thoughts: Verbalizing "Questions"
Questions to organize vague feelings into business terms
Team members who don't say anything, team members who insist on their own opinions
Think in advance about what kind of answer you want to hear
It's good to use examples appropriately.
What's Hidden Behind Words and Silence
A Leader's Questions That Get You to Say the Hard Things
The Truth About Embracing Diversity
How to Get Rid of That Anxious 'Feeling'
Chapter 6: Narrowing the Illusion of "Knowing": The Verbalization of "Communication"
What does 'easy to understand' mean?
If you touch my 'emotions', I'll agree
Delivering the 'numbers' first, not the conclusion.
A technology that allows even team members who can't explain things to report clearly
Narrow the gap in interpretation that arises from 'good intentions'
Correcting unconscious choices
As times change, the role of leaders must also change.
Detailed image
.jpg)
Into the book
Later, when I was involved in another corporate project, this time I was working with a leader who only spoke vaguely.
He, whose habit was to say, “Just take care of it yourself,” never said anything about what to do or how to do it.
For me, I just thought, 'This is wrong now,' but I didn't know what to do or how to fix it.
I racked my brain and managed to figure it out, but there were many points where I disagreed with my boss's "figure it out" and before I knew it, I had become a careless team member.
--- p.8
When a leader can clearly communicate his or her thoughts and share common principles with team members so they can discuss on the same basis, the team will move cohesively toward the answer they believe is right.
--- p.12
Simply expressing something in language does not mean that it has been 'verbalized'.
In other words, whether it has been verbalized or not depends on how clear the words are.
Therefore, just because you express yourself well does not mean you are verbalizing, and the act of creating words for the purpose of selling something is not verbalizing.
Conversely, if you can clearly express what's in your head, even if it's not language but pictures or numbers, you can say that it's been 'verbalized.'
--- p.24
This is not the kind of language required of a leader.
The goal isn't to be polished, nor is it okay to say anything as long as it leaves an impression on the other person.
The verbalization that a leader needs is not simply verbalization that captures people's hearts.
It is a language that enables team members to work appropriately.
--- p.27
What would happen in a sports game if the coach didn't give instructions? What if the players had to figure out how to win the game on their own? A coach who sat leisurely on the bench and said, "Think for yourself and run the game," would be fired immediately.
Without instructions, players will think and act on their own, but the result will be an inconsistent and chaotic operation.
The same goes for companies.
--- p.49
The first thing a leader must do is to clearly communicate to team members what they need to do today so that they can achieve their assigned goals.
At this time, verbalization must naturally contain actions that are directly linked to performance.
Vague instructions like “Do it yourself” are a dereliction of duty on the part of the leader.
--- p.65
Even when setting a sales target, saying “Let’s increase sales a bit more!” is abstract.
It is unclear how much sales will increase, which products will be sold, and when this goal will be achieved.
Even if you are fired up with the desire to “make this project a success together,” you don’t know what “success” means specifically or what actions are required.
In the end, the team members can only say, “I will work hard!”
There is no subsequent action.
--- p.81
The first step is to 'complete the sentence'.
The reason the expression becomes ambiguous is because the goal is presented with only words or nouns.
If you express it with words or nouns like 'customer first' or 'horizontal corporate culture', the information is omitted and the meaning becomes ambiguous.
At this time, complete the sentence by inserting a subject and a predicate.
The subject sets a specific character and the predicate is made into ‘aiming to be able to do ○○.’
For example, a restaurant's idea of 'customer first' might be as follows: 'We aim to create a situation where 'customers with children' can 'eat without worrying about the eyes of others or the time of use, even if their children make a lot of noise.'
--- p.86
What does "know" mean? Does it mean, "Do you know this product?" or "Yes, I know." It's like looking around a store and thinking, "I see this a lot."
Should we be thinking, "I guess it'll sell well?" The point isn't to find the right answer.
It's about knowing what state I intend to be in.
It is important to repeat the process of defining the manager's goals until they are clearly defined.
Once this point is clear, what must be done will also inevitably become clear.
Not only that, you can also give clear instructions to your team members.
--- p.93
The parties involved do not consider the meaningless work to be 'useless'.
I keep going because I think it's meaningful.
It's based on thoughts like, 'There may be something I missed,' 'It's important to see everyone face to face,' and 'Information needs to be shared.'
The problem is that these tasks usually don't lead to the organization's goals.
One of the leader's responsibilities is to point out tasks that are done out of inertia and tasks that are done with the mindset of "let's just do it for now because we don't know what will happen later," and to coordinate actions that lead to the initial results.
--- pp.130-131
To some extent, you can decide whether or not to do something by thinking about 'what changes will happen to whom if you don't do it?'
If you ask, “Should I do that?” nine times out of ten, the answer is “I should.”
Even if there's only a 1% chance that it might be needed someday, I think, 'I have to do it.'
Therefore, the question “Should I do it?” is meaningless.
The important question is, 'Will significant change occur if we don't do it?'
What significant changes will occur for whom if regular meetings are not held? If regular meetings, which have been in place for a long time, are eliminated, who will be significantly affected (changed)?
--- p.147
If expectations are expressed as “○○ can △△,” both the leader and team members can understand.
If you convey it as “so that the CEO can refer to it at the general shareholders’ meeting,” “so that the sales representative can pass it on to the customer,” or “so that I can attach it to the materials I report to my superiors” (among leaders), your team members will understand more clearly what format it should be in and what level of quality you want.
--- pp.156-157
There are cases where explanations that try to emphasize differentiation actually fail to differentiate.
Differentiation is about conveying the message, “Other products can’t achieve this goal, but ours can.”
There are three things a leader must check.
1) What goal are you trying to achieve? 2) Why can't existing products achieve that goal? 3) Why can your new product achieve that goal? --- p.165
To get the other person to accept, it is more effective to present a ‘similar situation that the other person knows’ rather than data or justification.
People only accept what they know.
If you know it, you can think, 'Oh, that's exactly the same.'
In other words, if you want the other person to understand deeply, rather than presenting data or proving justification, connect it to an example the other person already knows and say, “Look at this.
It is like that,” he conveys.
--- p.218
Our actions are largely dictated by the language we use.
As explained in the text, those who understand 'added value' as 'value added' are trying to add some function to the new product.
The words in your head determine your actions.
Language also influences those around us.
Words frequently used within an organization have a great influence on its members, whether good or bad, and determine their behavior.
He, whose habit was to say, “Just take care of it yourself,” never said anything about what to do or how to do it.
For me, I just thought, 'This is wrong now,' but I didn't know what to do or how to fix it.
I racked my brain and managed to figure it out, but there were many points where I disagreed with my boss's "figure it out" and before I knew it, I had become a careless team member.
--- p.8
When a leader can clearly communicate his or her thoughts and share common principles with team members so they can discuss on the same basis, the team will move cohesively toward the answer they believe is right.
--- p.12
Simply expressing something in language does not mean that it has been 'verbalized'.
In other words, whether it has been verbalized or not depends on how clear the words are.
Therefore, just because you express yourself well does not mean you are verbalizing, and the act of creating words for the purpose of selling something is not verbalizing.
Conversely, if you can clearly express what's in your head, even if it's not language but pictures or numbers, you can say that it's been 'verbalized.'
--- p.24
This is not the kind of language required of a leader.
The goal isn't to be polished, nor is it okay to say anything as long as it leaves an impression on the other person.
The verbalization that a leader needs is not simply verbalization that captures people's hearts.
It is a language that enables team members to work appropriately.
--- p.27
What would happen in a sports game if the coach didn't give instructions? What if the players had to figure out how to win the game on their own? A coach who sat leisurely on the bench and said, "Think for yourself and run the game," would be fired immediately.
Without instructions, players will think and act on their own, but the result will be an inconsistent and chaotic operation.
The same goes for companies.
--- p.49
The first thing a leader must do is to clearly communicate to team members what they need to do today so that they can achieve their assigned goals.
At this time, verbalization must naturally contain actions that are directly linked to performance.
Vague instructions like “Do it yourself” are a dereliction of duty on the part of the leader.
--- p.65
Even when setting a sales target, saying “Let’s increase sales a bit more!” is abstract.
It is unclear how much sales will increase, which products will be sold, and when this goal will be achieved.
Even if you are fired up with the desire to “make this project a success together,” you don’t know what “success” means specifically or what actions are required.
In the end, the team members can only say, “I will work hard!”
There is no subsequent action.
--- p.81
The first step is to 'complete the sentence'.
The reason the expression becomes ambiguous is because the goal is presented with only words or nouns.
If you express it with words or nouns like 'customer first' or 'horizontal corporate culture', the information is omitted and the meaning becomes ambiguous.
At this time, complete the sentence by inserting a subject and a predicate.
The subject sets a specific character and the predicate is made into ‘aiming to be able to do ○○.’
For example, a restaurant's idea of 'customer first' might be as follows: 'We aim to create a situation where 'customers with children' can 'eat without worrying about the eyes of others or the time of use, even if their children make a lot of noise.'
--- p.86
What does "know" mean? Does it mean, "Do you know this product?" or "Yes, I know." It's like looking around a store and thinking, "I see this a lot."
Should we be thinking, "I guess it'll sell well?" The point isn't to find the right answer.
It's about knowing what state I intend to be in.
It is important to repeat the process of defining the manager's goals until they are clearly defined.
Once this point is clear, what must be done will also inevitably become clear.
Not only that, you can also give clear instructions to your team members.
--- p.93
The parties involved do not consider the meaningless work to be 'useless'.
I keep going because I think it's meaningful.
It's based on thoughts like, 'There may be something I missed,' 'It's important to see everyone face to face,' and 'Information needs to be shared.'
The problem is that these tasks usually don't lead to the organization's goals.
One of the leader's responsibilities is to point out tasks that are done out of inertia and tasks that are done with the mindset of "let's just do it for now because we don't know what will happen later," and to coordinate actions that lead to the initial results.
--- pp.130-131
To some extent, you can decide whether or not to do something by thinking about 'what changes will happen to whom if you don't do it?'
If you ask, “Should I do that?” nine times out of ten, the answer is “I should.”
Even if there's only a 1% chance that it might be needed someday, I think, 'I have to do it.'
Therefore, the question “Should I do it?” is meaningless.
The important question is, 'Will significant change occur if we don't do it?'
What significant changes will occur for whom if regular meetings are not held? If regular meetings, which have been in place for a long time, are eliminated, who will be significantly affected (changed)?
--- p.147
If expectations are expressed as “○○ can △△,” both the leader and team members can understand.
If you convey it as “so that the CEO can refer to it at the general shareholders’ meeting,” “so that the sales representative can pass it on to the customer,” or “so that I can attach it to the materials I report to my superiors” (among leaders), your team members will understand more clearly what format it should be in and what level of quality you want.
--- pp.156-157
There are cases where explanations that try to emphasize differentiation actually fail to differentiate.
Differentiation is about conveying the message, “Other products can’t achieve this goal, but ours can.”
There are three things a leader must check.
1) What goal are you trying to achieve? 2) Why can't existing products achieve that goal? 3) Why can your new product achieve that goal? --- p.165
To get the other person to accept, it is more effective to present a ‘similar situation that the other person knows’ rather than data or justification.
People only accept what they know.
If you know it, you can think, 'Oh, that's exactly the same.'
In other words, if you want the other person to understand deeply, rather than presenting data or proving justification, connect it to an example the other person already knows and say, “Look at this.
It is like that,” he conveys.
--- p.218
Our actions are largely dictated by the language we use.
As explained in the text, those who understand 'added value' as 'value added' are trying to add some function to the new product.
The words in your head determine your actions.
Language also influences those around us.
Words frequently used within an organization have a great influence on its members, whether good or bad, and determine their behavior.
--- p.230
Publisher's Review
“Why can’t you do as I say?” vs. “So what exactly should I do?”
As times change, the role of leaders must also change.
In fact, in the 2023 Japan Productivity Association's "Ideal Boss Ranking" survey of new employees, "a boss who explains work in detail" ranked first with 79.0 percent.
Team members also want to be 'informed properly about the work' before discussing the leader's personality or team atmosphere.
The author says that our society has changed from “an era where there was one right answer” to “an era where there are countless right answers.”
Problems arise when the correct answers collide with each other among numerous correct answers.
This is why we need a leader who can clearly 'delegate' work, telling the team which direction to go, what to do each day, and what to instruct others.
As the author confesses that he wrote the book in the hope that it would help as many leaders as possible, the book vividly portrays the realistic concerns of leaders.
If you've ever thought, "I don't have any team members I can trust," learn how to clearly communicate what you want through this six-chapter manual that elicits precise team behavior.
When the leader's words change, team members begin to do the "real work" that leads to goal achievement.
“It is the leader's responsibility to verbalize the actions that team members should take.”
- Verbalization of 'leadership' and 'management'
Recently, many companies at home and abroad are placing importance on respect for diversity and psychological safety.
This is a perspective that sees motivating team members and increasing team cohesion as the essence of leadership.
Of course, trust is important in a company.
However, a more fundamental quality of a leader is to accurately identify and clearly communicate in words what team members need to do specifically to achieve the company's goals.
Parts 1 and 2 of the book clearly present how a leader's speech must change to ensure that team members' actions directly lead to the achievement of the company's goals, based on the essence of leadership that the author has discovered through extensive experience.
Our conversational habits are quite ambiguous.
From sentences without a subject or predicate to vague instructions like “Do as you please.”
The author specifically points out that regular meetings are conducted routinely without clearly stating 'for what purpose' and 'what action is taken'.
The reason for having a meeting is to check 'to what extent the work on a certain task has been completed.'
But leaders often just say, “Please share the progress of your work.”
To get the information you want, the leader should say, “Tell me about the tasks you worked on over the past week and how they helped you solve them.”
The same goes for work feedback.
Instead of saying, “It’s a little awkward,” or “Please edit it to resonate with the customer,” if you say, “Please add the missing message and fix the awkward part like this,” your team will produce more results in the same amount of time.
It is the 'leader's responsibility' to verbalize the actions that team members should take to perform their tasks.
Looking back on my experiences as a leader and examining the cases of companies I consulted for, organizations with leaders who "verbalize their actions" operate very efficiently.
_From page 48 of the text
While working at Recruit Inc. (a company that operates a job and recruitment platform), the author experienced firsthand how a leader's clear speech improved organizational efficiency.
Contract workers and beginner salespeople achieved the incredible feat of 100 million yen in monthly sales.
The author analyzes the reason for Recruit's success as being 'because Recruit is structured in a way that even people who are not good at sales can be good at sales.'
This is because the company does not rely on the individual abilities of its team members, and the upper management (leaders) thoroughly direct high-quality actions so that even the most savvy person can immediately know 'what to do'.
So team members could immediately achieve sales results without wasting time worrying about what to do.
What to do if things go wrong despite clear instructions
- Verbalization of 'goals' and 'directions'
First, let's think about the 'goals' of the company I work for or the project I'm currently working on.
While some goals can be expressed in numbers, such as "1 billion won in sales," most are qualitative goals, such as "strengthen product branding," "make customers smile," or "increase employee satisfaction."
The problem is that these emotional expressions can be interpreted differently depending on the person.
What condition is necessary to say a brand is strengthened? How can we make customers smile? How can we measure employee satisfaction?
If the goal is unclear, team members will not know what to do and will be unable to move.
Even if you think and act on your own, there are many cases where it is different from the direction the leader intended.
Part 3 of the book focuses on this very issue, introducing methods for translating vague vision into precise actions for team members.
Let's look at the framework of 'a state in which ○○ can do △△'.
A company's goals are often expressed in nouns, such as "customer first" or "horizontal corporate culture."
Goals presented in words alone like this are ambiguous because information is omitted.
At this time, if you put in a subject and a predicate and express it as '○○ aims for a state where △△ can be done', a specific customer base and the target state are drawn.
The phrase “customer first” is being revised to “our goal is to enable guests with children to eat without worrying about the eyes of others, even if their children make loud noises.”
Expressing it this way will give you a concrete picture of what you need to do to achieve your goal.
Once you have clearly communicated your goals, the next step is to 'direct' the actions to achieve them.
For leaders who worry about how detailed their instructions should be and whether team members will feel like they are micromanaging, the author suggests starting with three criteria.
It's about defining what you "should" do, verbalizing what you "shouldn't" do, and correcting the trajectory of your "misbehavior."
It's much more difficult to change the course of action your team is already taking than to direct them to take their first action. In this case, it's helpful to convey three things:
1) Communicate ‘where to focus’.
2) Communicate actions that will change the outcome.
3) Communicate the appropriate amount of the behavior to be performed.
Muscles grow when used, and words grow when spoken.
The same goes for the language of work.
If things go wrong even after you have clearly given instructions, the problem lies in the way you 'talk about things'.
This book covers the communication skills that transform a leader's vague words into clear strategies that move people.
_Heeren Choi · Operator of YouTube channel "Heeren Choi-nel" and author of "I'll Say What I Have to Say"
Employees who don't say anything VS team members who insist on their own opinions
- Verbalization of 'question' and 'communication'
There are times when you need to elicit a team member's opinion during work or in a meeting.
The role of a leader is especially important when it comes to team members who think, "I have to figure out the answer to this on my own," and don't speak up first.
For leaders struggling to communicate with their team members, Part 5 of the book will be of great help.
The reason team members don't speak up is not because they don't have thoughts, but because they don't have a framework to express their thoughts in words.
Sometimes emotions aren't strong enough to be expressed clearly in words.
If you want to communicate with a team member who's struggling with "What should I say?", try using appropriate examples.
If you want to open up a conversation, it's a good idea to use extreme examples ("What's your complaint?" ▶ "I don't understand why you're doing this?").
Team members' emotions begin to take on a sense of direction.
If you want to get an answer to a question, break it down and give an example (“What do you think about the new project?” ▶ “Do you think the new project can beat the existing competitors?”)
Finally, if your team member seems anxious about something, a 'future scenario example ("What do you think?" ▶ "If we continue like this, what do you think will happen in the future?")' is effective.
Conversely, there are team members who make claims or suggestions while being stuck in their own thoughts or stereotypes.
In these cases, the feedback is usually, “Please explain based on data or facts.”
But logic and evidence do not easily change people's minds.
In such cases, asking, “In what cases would this not apply?” will help your team members expand their perspective to areas where their argument does not apply.
Even if a leader's instructions are clear, team members may interpret them differently.
Because each person has their own 'line spacing'.
If a team member's line of thought deviates from the leader's intention, the leader must be able to anticipate the team member's thoughts and point out in advance that "that's not it."
This is a method of ‘deliberately mentioning and denying’ a part that could cause misunderstanding.
Team members interpret and act on the leader's words with 'good intentions'.
Let's be careful in advance to ensure that our good intentions don't lead to bad actions.
A leader needs the ability to communicate in an organization of people as much as the ability to do a good job.
By clearly understanding what the other person wants and clearly expressing what I want, I can expand the scope of cooperation between my team members and myself.
This book provides abundant examples to show you how to solve this difficult problem in the clearest way possible.
Lee Heon-ju, Research Professor, Yonsei University Future Convergence Research Institute, Counseling Expert
The author explains his ‘worldview on work’ as follows.
“A society where all workers can clearly recognize the value of their work and the business value of their existence.”
And the means to realize this worldview is ‘verbalization.’
Ultimately, language is necessary for business, but it is also necessary for humans to recognize their own value as 'Homo laborans' (working humans).
I hope this book will serve as a catalyst for all workers, regardless of whether they are leaders or team members, to recognize their own value in words.
As times change, the role of leaders must also change.
In fact, in the 2023 Japan Productivity Association's "Ideal Boss Ranking" survey of new employees, "a boss who explains work in detail" ranked first with 79.0 percent.
Team members also want to be 'informed properly about the work' before discussing the leader's personality or team atmosphere.
The author says that our society has changed from “an era where there was one right answer” to “an era where there are countless right answers.”
Problems arise when the correct answers collide with each other among numerous correct answers.
This is why we need a leader who can clearly 'delegate' work, telling the team which direction to go, what to do each day, and what to instruct others.
As the author confesses that he wrote the book in the hope that it would help as many leaders as possible, the book vividly portrays the realistic concerns of leaders.
If you've ever thought, "I don't have any team members I can trust," learn how to clearly communicate what you want through this six-chapter manual that elicits precise team behavior.
When the leader's words change, team members begin to do the "real work" that leads to goal achievement.
“It is the leader's responsibility to verbalize the actions that team members should take.”
- Verbalization of 'leadership' and 'management'
Recently, many companies at home and abroad are placing importance on respect for diversity and psychological safety.
This is a perspective that sees motivating team members and increasing team cohesion as the essence of leadership.
Of course, trust is important in a company.
However, a more fundamental quality of a leader is to accurately identify and clearly communicate in words what team members need to do specifically to achieve the company's goals.
Parts 1 and 2 of the book clearly present how a leader's speech must change to ensure that team members' actions directly lead to the achievement of the company's goals, based on the essence of leadership that the author has discovered through extensive experience.
Our conversational habits are quite ambiguous.
From sentences without a subject or predicate to vague instructions like “Do as you please.”
The author specifically points out that regular meetings are conducted routinely without clearly stating 'for what purpose' and 'what action is taken'.
The reason for having a meeting is to check 'to what extent the work on a certain task has been completed.'
But leaders often just say, “Please share the progress of your work.”
To get the information you want, the leader should say, “Tell me about the tasks you worked on over the past week and how they helped you solve them.”
The same goes for work feedback.
Instead of saying, “It’s a little awkward,” or “Please edit it to resonate with the customer,” if you say, “Please add the missing message and fix the awkward part like this,” your team will produce more results in the same amount of time.
It is the 'leader's responsibility' to verbalize the actions that team members should take to perform their tasks.
Looking back on my experiences as a leader and examining the cases of companies I consulted for, organizations with leaders who "verbalize their actions" operate very efficiently.
_From page 48 of the text
While working at Recruit Inc. (a company that operates a job and recruitment platform), the author experienced firsthand how a leader's clear speech improved organizational efficiency.
Contract workers and beginner salespeople achieved the incredible feat of 100 million yen in monthly sales.
The author analyzes the reason for Recruit's success as being 'because Recruit is structured in a way that even people who are not good at sales can be good at sales.'
This is because the company does not rely on the individual abilities of its team members, and the upper management (leaders) thoroughly direct high-quality actions so that even the most savvy person can immediately know 'what to do'.
So team members could immediately achieve sales results without wasting time worrying about what to do.
What to do if things go wrong despite clear instructions
- Verbalization of 'goals' and 'directions'
First, let's think about the 'goals' of the company I work for or the project I'm currently working on.
While some goals can be expressed in numbers, such as "1 billion won in sales," most are qualitative goals, such as "strengthen product branding," "make customers smile," or "increase employee satisfaction."
The problem is that these emotional expressions can be interpreted differently depending on the person.
What condition is necessary to say a brand is strengthened? How can we make customers smile? How can we measure employee satisfaction?
If the goal is unclear, team members will not know what to do and will be unable to move.
Even if you think and act on your own, there are many cases where it is different from the direction the leader intended.
Part 3 of the book focuses on this very issue, introducing methods for translating vague vision into precise actions for team members.
Let's look at the framework of 'a state in which ○○ can do △△'.
A company's goals are often expressed in nouns, such as "customer first" or "horizontal corporate culture."
Goals presented in words alone like this are ambiguous because information is omitted.
At this time, if you put in a subject and a predicate and express it as '○○ aims for a state where △△ can be done', a specific customer base and the target state are drawn.
The phrase “customer first” is being revised to “our goal is to enable guests with children to eat without worrying about the eyes of others, even if their children make loud noises.”
Expressing it this way will give you a concrete picture of what you need to do to achieve your goal.
Once you have clearly communicated your goals, the next step is to 'direct' the actions to achieve them.
For leaders who worry about how detailed their instructions should be and whether team members will feel like they are micromanaging, the author suggests starting with three criteria.
It's about defining what you "should" do, verbalizing what you "shouldn't" do, and correcting the trajectory of your "misbehavior."
It's much more difficult to change the course of action your team is already taking than to direct them to take their first action. In this case, it's helpful to convey three things:
1) Communicate ‘where to focus’.
2) Communicate actions that will change the outcome.
3) Communicate the appropriate amount of the behavior to be performed.
Muscles grow when used, and words grow when spoken.
The same goes for the language of work.
If things go wrong even after you have clearly given instructions, the problem lies in the way you 'talk about things'.
This book covers the communication skills that transform a leader's vague words into clear strategies that move people.
_Heeren Choi · Operator of YouTube channel "Heeren Choi-nel" and author of "I'll Say What I Have to Say"
Employees who don't say anything VS team members who insist on their own opinions
- Verbalization of 'question' and 'communication'
There are times when you need to elicit a team member's opinion during work or in a meeting.
The role of a leader is especially important when it comes to team members who think, "I have to figure out the answer to this on my own," and don't speak up first.
For leaders struggling to communicate with their team members, Part 5 of the book will be of great help.
The reason team members don't speak up is not because they don't have thoughts, but because they don't have a framework to express their thoughts in words.
Sometimes emotions aren't strong enough to be expressed clearly in words.
If you want to communicate with a team member who's struggling with "What should I say?", try using appropriate examples.
If you want to open up a conversation, it's a good idea to use extreme examples ("What's your complaint?" ▶ "I don't understand why you're doing this?").
Team members' emotions begin to take on a sense of direction.
If you want to get an answer to a question, break it down and give an example (“What do you think about the new project?” ▶ “Do you think the new project can beat the existing competitors?”)
Finally, if your team member seems anxious about something, a 'future scenario example ("What do you think?" ▶ "If we continue like this, what do you think will happen in the future?")' is effective.
Conversely, there are team members who make claims or suggestions while being stuck in their own thoughts or stereotypes.
In these cases, the feedback is usually, “Please explain based on data or facts.”
But logic and evidence do not easily change people's minds.
In such cases, asking, “In what cases would this not apply?” will help your team members expand their perspective to areas where their argument does not apply.
Even if a leader's instructions are clear, team members may interpret them differently.
Because each person has their own 'line spacing'.
If a team member's line of thought deviates from the leader's intention, the leader must be able to anticipate the team member's thoughts and point out in advance that "that's not it."
This is a method of ‘deliberately mentioning and denying’ a part that could cause misunderstanding.
Team members interpret and act on the leader's words with 'good intentions'.
Let's be careful in advance to ensure that our good intentions don't lead to bad actions.
A leader needs the ability to communicate in an organization of people as much as the ability to do a good job.
By clearly understanding what the other person wants and clearly expressing what I want, I can expand the scope of cooperation between my team members and myself.
This book provides abundant examples to show you how to solve this difficult problem in the clearest way possible.
Lee Heon-ju, Research Professor, Yonsei University Future Convergence Research Institute, Counseling Expert
The author explains his ‘worldview on work’ as follows.
“A society where all workers can clearly recognize the value of their work and the business value of their existence.”
And the means to realize this worldview is ‘verbalization.’
Ultimately, language is necessary for business, but it is also necessary for humans to recognize their own value as 'Homo laborans' (working humans).
I hope this book will serve as a catalyst for all workers, regardless of whether they are leaders or team members, to recognize their own value in words.
GOODS SPECIFICS
- Date of issue: June 20, 2025
- Page count, weight, size: 232 pages | 390g | 133*198*19mm
- ISBN13: 9791191842883
- ISBN10: 1191842886
You may also like
카테고리
korean
korean