It explores the structure of knowledge and consciousness, encompassing artificial intelligence, brain science, and philosophy.
Reinterpreting the thought processes of humans and AI from a neurocognitive perspective, this book redefines the nature of intelligence. AI Series.
You can find the artificial intelligence knowledge you need at aiseries.oopy.io.

Turing's model of a computer considers arithmetic calculations as the simplest human intellectual activity, but he envisions that in the future it will be able to perform all human intellectual activities.
So his ultimate question was, of course, this:
What is "intelligence"? Can machines think? What does it mean to think? He answered these questions in his 1950 paper, "Computing Machinery and Intelligence."
He published this paper in the philosophy journal, Mind.
He was a philosopher.
--- From "01_“Father of AI”"

According to von Neumann, a digital computer operates according to a sequence of instructions in a program.
To do so, the instruction must contain complex details such as where to retrieve the information stored, how to perform the operation, and where to send the result to memory for storage or output.
To perform such complex functions, a digital computer must be composed of complex devices, all of which must have special connection rules and limitations.
--- From “03_“Brain’s Computational Processing””

Long-held intuitive beliefs may turn out to be wrong.
I think now is the perfect time.
In relation to the recent existence of AI, the debate over whether AI will “be conscious” also needs to be viewed with this skeptical eye.
From a traditional perspective, scholars who speak of or are concerned about category errors draw boundaries in their research.
Such an attitude makes you and your colleagues hesitate to move forward.
The Churchlands' new reductionism allows AI researchers to get down to business.
(The discussion regarding the risks of AI is a separate topic.)
--- From “06_“Representation and Reduction””

Some cognitive scientists and philosophers say that in the evolutionary sequence, 'language' could have come first, and then 'thought' could have emerged.
According to them, we think through language.
In other words, thinking is linguistic.
Thinking in language leads us to assume that thinking itself is impossible without language.
From this perspective, studying the evolutionary origins of language seems important and highly valuable.
Because it is believed that this was the point at which mankind achieved high knowledge and wisdom.

--- From "09_“The Language of the Brain and AI”"