Beyond argument
 |
Description
Book Introduction
A Teacher's Reference Book that Can Be Applied Immediately to Real-World Classes
A must-read for students that will improve their skills in all subjects, starting with Korean.
A Citizen's Guide to Social Life
For better people, better communities
The usefulness and methods of 'argumentation' that we must know!
ㆍArgument, what use is that?
ㆍSome are arguments and some are not?
ㆍIf you are good at arguing, you can become a ‘better person’?
ㆍHow can we determine which policy is better?
ㆍCan we find out what the truth is?
In director Christopher Nolan's film "The Dark Knight," the main character Batman wears a cool suit at night and rides the Batmobile to save Gotham City from chaos caused by the mafia and the Joker.
But when you look closely at his actions, you feel somewhat uncomfortable calling him an 'apostle of justice'.
This is because while chasing the Joker, he destroys other people's cars, roads, and buildings (damage to property?), goes to Hong Kong, with which there is no extradition treaty, to capture the mafia's money manager (violation of international law?), and illegally wiretap the cell phones of all citizens of Gotham City to find the Joker's whereabouts (violation of the Information and Communications Network Act and Personal Information Protection Act?).
Is this really justice?
The answer and reason for this is “Batman is not an apostle of justice.
You could say, “Because he didn’t follow the law,” or, “Nevertheless, Batman is an apostle of justice.
You could say, “Because he had good intentions.”
Argumentation begins by finding a logical 'reason' (premise) for one's 'claim' (conclusion).
In short, the core of argumentation can be said to be ‘discussion’ based on ‘evidence.’
Argumentation is the act of reasoning that finds the most reasonable reason based on evidence, not 'just because', not 'because I want to believe so', not 'because it's advantageous to me'.
The authors of this book, "Argument Beyond," wrote this book not to show argumentation as a strictly logical form or as an argument to defeat an opponent, but as "the ability to overcome problems encountered in everyday life."
A person who can argue can confidently tell others about something he or she believes is right or valuable.
The power to get others to listen to and accept my story lies in argument.
Moreover, the more we share stories based on arguments, the more society can overcome its previous problems and become a better community.
And people who can argue can ask questions about things that have vaguely puzzled them in their daily lives, work situations, and learning situations, and find the best answers to their questions.
This is because argumentation is the act of examining and exploring the various aspects of human life that we were previously unaware of, which are complex, multifaceted, and even contradictory, and moving toward a better conclusion.
In the process, we can become better people who go beyond our previous selves.
A must-read for students that will improve their skills in all subjects, starting with Korean.
A Citizen's Guide to Social Life
For better people, better communities
The usefulness and methods of 'argumentation' that we must know!
ㆍArgument, what use is that?
ㆍSome are arguments and some are not?
ㆍIf you are good at arguing, you can become a ‘better person’?
ㆍHow can we determine which policy is better?
ㆍCan we find out what the truth is?
In director Christopher Nolan's film "The Dark Knight," the main character Batman wears a cool suit at night and rides the Batmobile to save Gotham City from chaos caused by the mafia and the Joker.
But when you look closely at his actions, you feel somewhat uncomfortable calling him an 'apostle of justice'.
This is because while chasing the Joker, he destroys other people's cars, roads, and buildings (damage to property?), goes to Hong Kong, with which there is no extradition treaty, to capture the mafia's money manager (violation of international law?), and illegally wiretap the cell phones of all citizens of Gotham City to find the Joker's whereabouts (violation of the Information and Communications Network Act and Personal Information Protection Act?).
Is this really justice?
The answer and reason for this is “Batman is not an apostle of justice.
You could say, “Because he didn’t follow the law,” or, “Nevertheless, Batman is an apostle of justice.
You could say, “Because he had good intentions.”
Argumentation begins by finding a logical 'reason' (premise) for one's 'claim' (conclusion).
In short, the core of argumentation can be said to be ‘discussion’ based on ‘evidence.’
Argumentation is the act of reasoning that finds the most reasonable reason based on evidence, not 'just because', not 'because I want to believe so', not 'because it's advantageous to me'.
The authors of this book, "Argument Beyond," wrote this book not to show argumentation as a strictly logical form or as an argument to defeat an opponent, but as "the ability to overcome problems encountered in everyday life."
A person who can argue can confidently tell others about something he or she believes is right or valuable.
The power to get others to listen to and accept my story lies in argument.
Moreover, the more we share stories based on arguments, the more society can overcome its previous problems and become a better community.
And people who can argue can ask questions about things that have vaguely puzzled them in their daily lives, work situations, and learning situations, and find the best answers to their questions.
This is because argumentation is the act of examining and exploring the various aspects of human life that we were previously unaware of, which are complex, multifaceted, and even contradictory, and moving toward a better conclusion.
In the process, we can become better people who go beyond our previous selves.
- You can preview some of the book's contents.
Preview
index
A word from the 'Conceptual Korean Language Life' project
preface
Class 1.
The Nature of Argumentation - What is Argumentation?
The concept and value of argument
Argument, what use is it?
What is a 'good' argument?
Some are arguments and some are not?
Being good at arguing can make you a 'better person'?
Types of arguments
Can 'value' also be persuasive? - Equality or righteousness!
How can we determine which policy is better? - What is in our best interest?
Can you uncover the truth? - You're the culprit!
Components of an Argument
Why We Need to Consider the Components of an Argument
What will the argument consist of?
Method of argument
How can we make rational decisions?
What are some effective argument methods?
Issues to consider in the argument
Class 2.
Argumentation in Various Situations - Argumentation, How to Be Good at It?
Argumentation in Persuasive Writing
How should we define the problem to begin our argument?
Is it better to support my conclusion or to refute someone else's conclusion?
Where should we look for the cause of the problem?
Is it a rational or emotional appeal?
How to write in a structured way that fits the argument?
Argumentation in Debate
Is the purpose of debate really to win?
Types of discussions used in education
How can I be good at debating?
Argumentation for Inquiry and Learning
Argumentation as a Learning Tool
How should we set the object of argument?
How should the argument be developed?
How can we present the results of our argument in a way that is impressive?
Note
References
preface
Class 1.
The Nature of Argumentation - What is Argumentation?
The concept and value of argument
Argument, what use is it?
What is a 'good' argument?
Some are arguments and some are not?
Being good at arguing can make you a 'better person'?
Types of arguments
Can 'value' also be persuasive? - Equality or righteousness!
How can we determine which policy is better? - What is in our best interest?
Can you uncover the truth? - You're the culprit!
Components of an Argument
Why We Need to Consider the Components of an Argument
What will the argument consist of?
Method of argument
How can we make rational decisions?
What are some effective argument methods?
Issues to consider in the argument
Class 2.
Argumentation in Various Situations - Argumentation, How to Be Good at It?
Argumentation in Persuasive Writing
How should we define the problem to begin our argument?
Is it better to support my conclusion or to refute someone else's conclusion?
Where should we look for the cause of the problem?
Is it a rational or emotional appeal?
How to write in a structured way that fits the argument?
Argumentation in Debate
Is the purpose of debate really to win?
Types of discussions used in education
How can I be good at debating?
Argumentation for Inquiry and Learning
Argumentation as a Learning Tool
How should we set the object of argument?
How should the argument be developed?
How can we present the results of our argument in a way that is impressive?
Note
References
Detailed image
Publisher's Review
From the 'essence of argument'
Up to 'argumentation methods in various situations'
Chapter 1 presents the essence and structure of argumentation step by step, starting from the concept and value of argumentation to its types, composition, and methods.
The authors describe argumentation as a process of reasoning that seeks rational reasons rather than simple assertions or emotional persuasion, and say that a good argument aims not to defeat the opponent but to reach the most reasonable conclusion.
Arguments are categorized into 'factual arguments, value arguments, and policy arguments' depending on the subject matter covered. All arguments must have 'validity, relevance, and sufficiency' as necessary conditions, and are presented as a tool of rational persuasion that leads to social consensus and change.
An argument consists of four elements: claim, reason, basis, and acceptance and refutation of counterarguments.
The authors say that the best arguments are those that listen to counterarguments, respond with valid reasons, and seek the most persuasive conclusion. Through this, we can understand others' thoughts, reflect on our own views, and acquire argumentation as a training in thought and a communication skill.
Argumentation is the process of logically connecting claims, reasons, and evidence, and anticipating and responding to counterarguments.
When developing an argument, you must start with a clear problem, present evidence, and check any hidden premises or conclusions.
Therefore, good argumentation is a training of the mind to critically understand the arguments of others and to support one's own arguments.
Ultimately, argumentation is a journey of rational thought that goes beyond persuasion to understanding, and beyond others to oneself.
Chapter 2 presents specific methods for developing argumentative thinking and enhancing persuasiveness in various situations such as writing, discussion, inquiry, and learning.
First, in 'Argumentation in Persuasive Writing,' the authors explain step-by-step, 'How should I define the problem to begin the argument?', 'Is it better to support my conclusion or refute someone else's conclusion?', 'Where should I look for the cause of the problem?', 'Is it better to explain logically or appeal to emotions?', etc.
And we will look specifically at the general order of argumentative writing: ‘introduction, development, and conclusion.’
In 'Argumentation in Debate', it is explained that debate is an act of persuading an opponent with words that have an argumentative structure, and that it is a place of communication that goes beyond a confrontation for and against and solves community problems together.
The purpose of debate is not to compete, but to understand others' opinions, respond logically, and find better conclusions together. It emphasizes that it is a place for collaborative discussion that respects diverse perspectives and expands thinking, rather than an emotional confrontation.
'Argumentation for inquiry and learning' is the process of finding the cause of a problem, analyzing causal relationships, and constructing new knowledge.
Here, argumentation becomes a learning tool, and the authors explain step by step how to set the object of argumentation, how to develop the content of argumentation, and how to present the results of argumentation in an impressive way.
Korean Language Life with 'Concepts' (10 Volumes, Part 1)
"Conceptual Korean Language Life" is a publication by the Korean Language Education Society, Korea's first, best, and largest academic organization. To celebrate its 70th anniversary (launched as the "Korean Language Education Research Society" in 1955), the Society selects and publishes 20 of the most important "concepts" in Korean language education to summarize its academic achievements to date. The publication plan is to begin with the first 10 volumes in 2025, with the remaining 10 volumes to be completed in 2026.
This series was centered around the next generation of Korean language education scholars who will lead the Korean language education field and teachers who are leading the Korean language education field. It was planned with the goal of providing practical help not only to teachers and students in school education, but also to contribute to the language life of ordinary citizens by writing easy-to-understand content on the 'concepts' that are important in Korean language education.
Up to 'argumentation methods in various situations'
Chapter 1 presents the essence and structure of argumentation step by step, starting from the concept and value of argumentation to its types, composition, and methods.
The authors describe argumentation as a process of reasoning that seeks rational reasons rather than simple assertions or emotional persuasion, and say that a good argument aims not to defeat the opponent but to reach the most reasonable conclusion.
Arguments are categorized into 'factual arguments, value arguments, and policy arguments' depending on the subject matter covered. All arguments must have 'validity, relevance, and sufficiency' as necessary conditions, and are presented as a tool of rational persuasion that leads to social consensus and change.
An argument consists of four elements: claim, reason, basis, and acceptance and refutation of counterarguments.
The authors say that the best arguments are those that listen to counterarguments, respond with valid reasons, and seek the most persuasive conclusion. Through this, we can understand others' thoughts, reflect on our own views, and acquire argumentation as a training in thought and a communication skill.
Argumentation is the process of logically connecting claims, reasons, and evidence, and anticipating and responding to counterarguments.
When developing an argument, you must start with a clear problem, present evidence, and check any hidden premises or conclusions.
Therefore, good argumentation is a training of the mind to critically understand the arguments of others and to support one's own arguments.
Ultimately, argumentation is a journey of rational thought that goes beyond persuasion to understanding, and beyond others to oneself.
Chapter 2 presents specific methods for developing argumentative thinking and enhancing persuasiveness in various situations such as writing, discussion, inquiry, and learning.
First, in 'Argumentation in Persuasive Writing,' the authors explain step-by-step, 'How should I define the problem to begin the argument?', 'Is it better to support my conclusion or refute someone else's conclusion?', 'Where should I look for the cause of the problem?', 'Is it better to explain logically or appeal to emotions?', etc.
And we will look specifically at the general order of argumentative writing: ‘introduction, development, and conclusion.’
In 'Argumentation in Debate', it is explained that debate is an act of persuading an opponent with words that have an argumentative structure, and that it is a place of communication that goes beyond a confrontation for and against and solves community problems together.
The purpose of debate is not to compete, but to understand others' opinions, respond logically, and find better conclusions together. It emphasizes that it is a place for collaborative discussion that respects diverse perspectives and expands thinking, rather than an emotional confrontation.
'Argumentation for inquiry and learning' is the process of finding the cause of a problem, analyzing causal relationships, and constructing new knowledge.
Here, argumentation becomes a learning tool, and the authors explain step by step how to set the object of argumentation, how to develop the content of argumentation, and how to present the results of argumentation in an impressive way.
Korean Language Life with 'Concepts' (10 Volumes, Part 1)
"Conceptual Korean Language Life" is a publication by the Korean Language Education Society, Korea's first, best, and largest academic organization. To celebrate its 70th anniversary (launched as the "Korean Language Education Research Society" in 1955), the Society selects and publishes 20 of the most important "concepts" in Korean language education to summarize its academic achievements to date. The publication plan is to begin with the first 10 volumes in 2025, with the remaining 10 volumes to be completed in 2026.
This series was centered around the next generation of Korean language education scholars who will lead the Korean language education field and teachers who are leading the Korean language education field. It was planned with the goal of providing practical help not only to teachers and students in school education, but also to contribute to the language life of ordinary citizens by writing easy-to-understand content on the 'concepts' that are important in Korean language education.
GOODS SPECIFICS
- Date of issue: October 18, 2025
- Page count, weight, size: 176 pages | 128*188*20mm
- ISBN13: 9791168103658
- ISBN10: 1168103657
You may also like
카테고리
korean
korean
![ELLE 엘르 스페셜 에디션 A형 : 12월 [2025]](http://librairie.coreenne.fr/cdn/shop/files/b8e27a3de6c9538896439686c6b0e8fb.jpg?v=1766436872&width=3840)
