Without fear, confidently
Telling you how to find your rights
A must-read for democratic citizens!
Don't Be Afraid: Criminal Procedure: Trial Edition

The Lawyers for a Democratic Society (Minbyun), a staunch friend and ally of democratic citizens and candlelight vigils, has published "Don't Be Afraid of Criminal Procedure: Trial Edition."
This is a follow-up to the 2015 revised edition of 『Don't Be Afraid of Criminal Procedure: Investigation Edition』, and is a criminal trial response manual that provides an easy and clear explanation of the full-scale trial process from the perspective of the suspect and defendant, and suggests action plans.

A criminal trial is a process of determining whether a defendant is guilty or not.
Criminal procedure is a device to ensure fair judgment.
The important thing is to know how the judge determines guilt or innocence through the process.
The order in which a judge determines guilt or innocence is elements of the crime → illegality → criminal responsibility.
If all three of the above are examined in order and determined to be present, the defendant is found guilty; if even one of them is not present, the defendant is found not guilty.

--- From “Part 1, “How Do Judges Determine Guilt or Innocence?”

The defendant's closing statement is the last opportunity to speak directly to the court before the verdict is announced, after all evidence has been examined.
Therefore, it is necessary to state what you want to say in as concise a manner as possible.
If there is a lawyer, the legal aspects are argued separately in the lawyer's closing argument.
So, it is effective to talk about things other than the legal aspects, such as the unfair aspects you felt as a party during the case, the parts you most want to emotionally appeal to the court, and your thoughts during the trial process.
If there is something important you want to say, you can write it down on a piece of paper in advance and read it.
If you are claiming innocence, it is best to point out the most unfair points in the prosecution's indictment and express them directly in words.
If you are hoping to receive a lighter sentence, you need to state the circumstances that require leniency in detail (agreement with the victim, raising young children, supporting elderly parents, illness, financial difficulties, sincere reflection, etc.).
Because the judges who make up the court are also human, the nuances conveyed directly from person to person through words are perceived qualitatively differently than those seen in documents and records.
From the court's perspective, you, as a party to the case, should prepare your statement by considering what you think would be most persuasive.
The practical meaning of the presiding judge giving the defendant an opportunity to say, “Defendant, if you have any final words,” before concluding the trial according to the law, is that “the defendant can directly verbally convey what he or she wants to say to the court without interference from anyone.”
--- From “Part 2, “Submission of Final Statement and Summary of Argument”

Q.
If the perpetrator is criminally punished, can I automatically receive compensation for the damages?
A.
no.
Even if the perpetrator is tried and convicted, he or she is not automatically entitled to compensation for the damages.
In order to receive compensation for damages, one must either mediate the case during the investigation, reach a settlement during the criminal trial and have the agreement recorded in the trial record, or file a lawsuit for damages separately from the criminal trial of the perpetrator.
(p.273) --- From “Part 4, Special Cases for the Disabled, Victims of Sexual Violence, Juveniles, and Foreigners”

For those of us who have grown accustomed to the Cold War logic of the National Security Act, which interprets North Korea as an anti-state organization, the National Security Act trial is a story from a distant land.
But in today's climate where the leaders of North and South Korea and the leaders of North Korea and the United States frequently hold summits, everyone's interest in North Korea is growing.
Public opinion favorable to North Korea will be formed, and contact, exchange, and travel with North Korea will arise.
In this way, you too may naturally engage in actions that violate the National Security Act, such as praising the North Korean leader or agreeing with North Korea's claims, without being greatly aware of the National Security Act.
If inter-Korean relations become inconsistent and improve and then worsen, your actions related to North Korea could become a problem under the National Security Act, which could lead to serious trouble.
Your interactions, contacts, exchanges, meetings, and words and actions in an atmosphere of mutual respect during an era of peace and reconciliation could become targets of the National Security Act and subject to accusations of pro-North Korea sentiment.
Since the division, the logic behind the application of the National Security Act has not changed.
Therefore, your carelessness in completely ignoring the National Security Act, intoxicated by the dream of peace, prosperity, and unification on the Korean Peninsula just because inter-Korean relations have improved, could lead to unexpected dangers.
This is why you should study the "Don't Be Afraid" secrets in this book in case you are tried under the National Security Act.
--- From “Part 5, National Security Act”

Q. Will I be punished for simply forwarding or retweeting someone else's post on social media?
A.
right.
Even if you simply repeat false rumors spread by others, you will be punished as well.
Because it would be considered an act of spreading rumors.
However, the punishment may be a little lighter than that of the person who originally coined the term.
So, don't be so quick to click retweet or share.
You should be suspicious that this article is fake news, and if there are such circumstances, you should not spread the word.
Q.
How much should I give as a settlement amount?
A.
There is no set standard for the settlement amount.
The most important criterion is the extent of the damage suffered by the victim due to defamation or insult.
If you have suffered irreparable emotional damage or have had your social reputation seriously damaged because of a lie you told, you should pay a large settlement.
If it is just simple swearing or defamation, it is often settled at around 500,000 won or 1 million won.
It is also a good idea to seek the assistance of a lawyer when determining the amount of the settlement.

--- From “Part 5, Freedom of Expression”