
Why Empires Fall
Description
Book Introduction
*** Best Economics Books of 2023, selected by the Financial Times
*** Recommended reading by the British newspapers The Economist and The Telegraph
*** Recommended reading by University of Michigan historian David Porter
Trade wars, unequal structures, excessive public debt…
Signs of Collapse in the World Order Since the 21st Century
If we go the Roman way, history will inevitably repeat itself!
“Make America Great Again.” This slogan, made famous by former President Trump during the 2016 U.S. presidential election, paradoxically implies that America is no longer great.
Medieval historian Peter Heder and political economist John Lafley, authors of “Why Empires Fall,” go a step further, asserting that the West, including the United States, “cannot become great again in the same way as before.”
The old way of doing things, the post-World War II world order, is already showing signs of collapse today.
Until the end of the 20th century, the West reigned as a de facto economic empire over Third World countries through the free trade and international financial system known as the Bretton Woods system, but its dominance has been rapidly collapsing since the beginning of the 21st century.
The West's share of global gross domestic product (GGP), which was close to 80 percent in 1999, fell to 60 percent in just 10 years following the 2008 global financial crisis, and China is emerging as a new superpower, threatening American hegemony.
Through a sophisticated comparison of the political and economic history of the modern West with the history of the decline and fall of the Roman Empire, the authors diagnose why the current world order is bound to collapse and propose a new world order that will resolve the contradictions of the imperial system.
"Why Empires Fall" offers a completely new interpretation of the decline and fall of the Roman Empire, drawing on the latest archaeological research, and transcending today's rapidly changing world situation, providing readers with insight into history, geopolitics, and economics.
*** Recommended reading by the British newspapers The Economist and The Telegraph
*** Recommended reading by University of Michigan historian David Porter
Trade wars, unequal structures, excessive public debt…
Signs of Collapse in the World Order Since the 21st Century
If we go the Roman way, history will inevitably repeat itself!
“Make America Great Again.” This slogan, made famous by former President Trump during the 2016 U.S. presidential election, paradoxically implies that America is no longer great.
Medieval historian Peter Heder and political economist John Lafley, authors of “Why Empires Fall,” go a step further, asserting that the West, including the United States, “cannot become great again in the same way as before.”
The old way of doing things, the post-World War II world order, is already showing signs of collapse today.
Until the end of the 20th century, the West reigned as a de facto economic empire over Third World countries through the free trade and international financial system known as the Bretton Woods system, but its dominance has been rapidly collapsing since the beginning of the 21st century.
The West's share of global gross domestic product (GGP), which was close to 80 percent in 1999, fell to 60 percent in just 10 years following the 2008 global financial crisis, and China is emerging as a new superpower, threatening American hegemony.
Through a sophisticated comparison of the political and economic history of the modern West with the history of the decline and fall of the Roman Empire, the authors diagnose why the current world order is bound to collapse and propose a new world order that will resolve the contradictions of the imperial system.
"Why Empires Fall" offers a completely new interpretation of the decline and fall of the Roman Empire, drawing on the latest archaeological research, and transcending today's rapidly changing world situation, providing readers with insight into history, geopolitics, and economics.
- You can preview some of the book's contents.
Preview
index
Translator's Preface
Introduction: Follow the Money
Part 1: Déjà Vu of Prosperity
Pax Romana and the West before the 21st century
Chapter 1: Rome in 399, Washington in 1999
Chapter 2 Empire and Abundance
Chapter 3 East of the Rhine, North of the Danube
Chapter 4: The Power of Money
Part 2: From the End to Change
A New World Order Beyond the Imperial System
Chapter 5: The Collapsing World
Chapter 6: The Barbarian Invasion
Chapter 7 Power and the Periphery
Chapter 8: The Death of a Nation?
Conclusion: Is this the death of the empire?
main
Additional Materials
Search
Introduction: Follow the Money
Part 1: Déjà Vu of Prosperity
Pax Romana and the West before the 21st century
Chapter 1: Rome in 399, Washington in 1999
Chapter 2 Empire and Abundance
Chapter 3 East of the Rhine, North of the Danube
Chapter 4: The Power of Money
Part 2: From the End to Change
A New World Order Beyond the Imperial System
Chapter 5: The Collapsing World
Chapter 6: The Barbarian Invasion
Chapter 7 Power and the Periphery
Chapter 8: The Death of a Nation?
Conclusion: Is this the death of the empire?
main
Additional Materials
Search
Into the book
Readers might be tempted to dismiss the problems they face as a fire across the river, as if the West is collapsing, as if they were not our problem.
Unfortunately, however, globalization has had a direct impact on the West, and Korea has been unable to avoid it. As a country that has experienced rapid growth, Korea has also experienced problems that have emerged at a rapid pace, following in the footsteps of the West.
(…) Simply put, the fire from the West across the river came to us by boat.
--- From the Translator's Preface
The world deposited its surpluses in Western banks, first in pounds and later in dollars, and these currencies replaced gold as the lubricant for international trade.
Western universities became meccas for ambitious intellectuals from around the world, and until the late 20th century, the world enjoyed both Hollywood movies and European football.
Then suddenly history was turned upside down.
--- From "Introduction: Follow the Money"
Gibbon was wrong.
The Roman Empire did not experience a long, slow decline from its golden age in the 2nd century until its inevitable fall in the 5th century.
The empire was at the peak of its prosperity until just before its collapse.
--- From "Chapter 1 Rome in 399, Washington in 1999"
Now two powerful parallels begin to emerge between Roman history and the history of the modern West.
(…) Both empires exercised their dominance and grew wealthy through the surrounding world.
But by doing so, both empires inadvertently altered the strategic and geopolitical context in which they operated, and this lay the root of their downfall.
--- From "Chapter 2 Empire and Abundance"
The modern West, born of great powers equipped with navies and railroad construction capabilities sufficient to build vast empires, created a much more complex geography.
But a closer look reveals that its interlocking economic structure operated in a manner broadly similar to that of its counterpart, ancient Rome.
--- From "Chapter 3: East of the Rhine, North of the Danube"
Although the formal political control of imperialism had disappeared, the imperialist (or, as is often called, neocolonial) economic system continued to function, providing material benefits to the center.
As a result, the per capita income ratio between the 'West and the Rest' increased from about 3:1 in 1950 to double that by the end of the century.
--- From "Chapter 4 The Power of Money"
As the system collapsed, the Roman Empire fell into decline.
Superpower competition and the assertiveness of a developing inner periphery, combined with significant migration flows from the outer periphery and beyond, placed additional stresses on the system, all of which was sometimes intertwined with bitter internal political divisions at each level.
--- From "Chapter 5: The Collapsing World"
What is putting pressure on Western welfare states is not the influx of foreigners, but the post-war prosperity that has extended life expectancy and dramatically increased dependency ratios.
Relying on foreign-trained doctors and nurses has saved many public systems from collapse (Australia and Canada's systems would cease to function without them) and saved Western taxpayers enormous sums of money by shifting much of the cost of producing medical staff to other countries.
--- From "Chapter 6: Invasion of the Barbarians"
While institutional and ideological differences are undeniable, China's sheer size and growing economic and diplomatic influence over developing countries suggest that it will inevitably join the strategy of transitioning to a new global political structure.
While this may be humiliating for the Western powers that until recently dictated what China should do, history suggests the alternative is far worse.
--- From "Chapter 7 Power and the Periphery"
Thus, the West's response to the coronavirus crisis has brought key questions, previously hidden beneath the surface of globalization, to the forefront of debate with renewed urgency.
Who will repay the West's massive debt, and how? And what will Western society look like in the future?
--- From "Chapter 8: The Death of a Nation?"
But whatever happens, the West can never again be great from the perspective of the 19th and 20th centuries.
The fundamental structure of the world economy has changed so profoundly that some leaders must stop pretending that greatness can be restored.
Moreover, if anyone is even remotely honest about the extent of the oppression and exploitation upon which the modern Western empire was built in the first place, they should not mourn its death.
Unfortunately, however, globalization has had a direct impact on the West, and Korea has been unable to avoid it. As a country that has experienced rapid growth, Korea has also experienced problems that have emerged at a rapid pace, following in the footsteps of the West.
(…) Simply put, the fire from the West across the river came to us by boat.
--- From the Translator's Preface
The world deposited its surpluses in Western banks, first in pounds and later in dollars, and these currencies replaced gold as the lubricant for international trade.
Western universities became meccas for ambitious intellectuals from around the world, and until the late 20th century, the world enjoyed both Hollywood movies and European football.
Then suddenly history was turned upside down.
--- From "Introduction: Follow the Money"
Gibbon was wrong.
The Roman Empire did not experience a long, slow decline from its golden age in the 2nd century until its inevitable fall in the 5th century.
The empire was at the peak of its prosperity until just before its collapse.
--- From "Chapter 1 Rome in 399, Washington in 1999"
Now two powerful parallels begin to emerge between Roman history and the history of the modern West.
(…) Both empires exercised their dominance and grew wealthy through the surrounding world.
But by doing so, both empires inadvertently altered the strategic and geopolitical context in which they operated, and this lay the root of their downfall.
--- From "Chapter 2 Empire and Abundance"
The modern West, born of great powers equipped with navies and railroad construction capabilities sufficient to build vast empires, created a much more complex geography.
But a closer look reveals that its interlocking economic structure operated in a manner broadly similar to that of its counterpart, ancient Rome.
--- From "Chapter 3: East of the Rhine, North of the Danube"
Although the formal political control of imperialism had disappeared, the imperialist (or, as is often called, neocolonial) economic system continued to function, providing material benefits to the center.
As a result, the per capita income ratio between the 'West and the Rest' increased from about 3:1 in 1950 to double that by the end of the century.
--- From "Chapter 4 The Power of Money"
As the system collapsed, the Roman Empire fell into decline.
Superpower competition and the assertiveness of a developing inner periphery, combined with significant migration flows from the outer periphery and beyond, placed additional stresses on the system, all of which was sometimes intertwined with bitter internal political divisions at each level.
--- From "Chapter 5: The Collapsing World"
What is putting pressure on Western welfare states is not the influx of foreigners, but the post-war prosperity that has extended life expectancy and dramatically increased dependency ratios.
Relying on foreign-trained doctors and nurses has saved many public systems from collapse (Australia and Canada's systems would cease to function without them) and saved Western taxpayers enormous sums of money by shifting much of the cost of producing medical staff to other countries.
--- From "Chapter 6: Invasion of the Barbarians"
While institutional and ideological differences are undeniable, China's sheer size and growing economic and diplomatic influence over developing countries suggest that it will inevitably join the strategy of transitioning to a new global political structure.
While this may be humiliating for the Western powers that until recently dictated what China should do, history suggests the alternative is far worse.
--- From "Chapter 7 Power and the Periphery"
Thus, the West's response to the coronavirus crisis has brought key questions, previously hidden beneath the surface of globalization, to the forefront of debate with renewed urgency.
Who will repay the West's massive debt, and how? And what will Western society look like in the future?
--- From "Chapter 8: The Death of a Nation?"
But whatever happens, the West can never again be great from the perspective of the 19th and 20th centuries.
The fundamental structure of the world economy has changed so profoundly that some leaders must stop pretending that greatness can be restored.
Moreover, if anyone is even remotely honest about the extent of the oppression and exploitation upon which the modern Western empire was built in the first place, they should not mourn its death.
--- From "Conclusion: The Death of the Empire?"
Publisher's Review
“The empire was on the verge of collapse,
“It was at the peak of prosperity.”
Edward Gibbon's 'The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' is wrong!
How Empires Prosper and Fall
A fun, fresh, and sophisticated comparison of Roman and modern history.
Peter Heather and John Rapley refute Edward Gibbon's The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, which remains the most important work in analyzing the causes of Rome's fall both inside and outside academia, from both economic and cultural perspectives.
First, on the economic side, Gibbon argued that the Roman Empire experienced a slow and long economic decline from its golden age in the 2nd century to its inevitable collapse in the 5th century, but this was not true.
According to recent archaeological research, the gross economic output of almost all settlements actually peaked in the 4th century, just before the empire's political collapse.
This is a chilling message for the West, which enjoyed peak prosperity until the end of the 20th century and is only now beginning to show economic decline in the 21st century.
This means that if we do not make the right political and economic choices now, we could soon collapse like the Roman Empire.
From a cultural perspective, Gibbon argued that the introduction of Christianity undermined the Roman Empire's characteristic belligerence, caused internal divisions, and diminished its economic vitality.
Some Western leaders, including Donald Trump and Boris Johnson, have erected high barriers to immigration, seemingly inspired by The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. However, consistent research since the 1950s has shown that there is little historical evidence to support Gibbon's claims.
Rather, Christianity enabled Rome to achieve cultural integration while ruling its vast empire.
Meanwhile, the authors argue that while 'barbarian' invasions were clearly a powerful threat to the Roman Empire, modern immigration has been an economic boon to the West.
Immigrants are supporting the labor force and public services that have been left vacant due to the aging population and low birth rate.
The authors cite Japan's immigration policy as the basis for their argument, which has stalled economic growth for a long time.
The two authors do not only focus on the differences between Roman history and modern history.
In chapters 3 and 4, the authors describe the changing relationship between the empire and its periphery as a result of the flow of wealth.
The description comparing Rome, which relied on land transport, with the modern West, which is connected by sea routes and railways, is very sophisticated and interesting.
The West, which has used its dense trade networks to move its production plants further and further afield in search of cheap labor, is facing a significant challenge from the Third World, a challenge that bears a striking resemblance to what the Roman Empire faced as its periphery grew economically.
Chapters 5 and 6 compare the external shock of the Huns' expansion to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The authors also argue that the former Soviet Union was not a true competitor to the United States during the Cold War, and that the United States' strategic line, which finally faced a competitor called China, can be traced back to the temporary cooperative relationship between the Roman Empire and Persia.
Is it a fire across the river, or a fire that spread by boat?
Low growth, low birth rates, anti-immigrant sentiment, a shrinking technology gap…
Why Korea is not free from the problems of Western empires
Translator Lee Seong-min states in the “Translator’s Preface” that the problems of the West are also occurring at a rapid pace in Korea.
It is a well-known fact that Korea has the lowest birth rate in the world.
The conflict between indigenous people and immigrants is more explicit in Korea.
The technology gap in industries where Korea was a leader is rapidly narrowing.
Korea is no exception to external shocks such as climate change.
Moreover, Korea must play a mediating role in the US-China hegemony competition.
This is why we cannot just watch the problems of the West unfold.
There is an English expression, “History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes.”
"Why Empires Fall" offers a broad perspective on the recurring modern history, rhyming with Roman history, and the rapidly changing global economy.
“Besides its practical utility, this book has another gift.
It is an insight that penetrates time and space and an expansion of the perspective that understands the present age.
Just as climbing a high mountain allows you to see things you couldn't see from a small path, this book, "Why Empires Fall," allows you to broadly compare the two important historical periods of 399 and 1999."
From the Translator's Preface
“It was at the peak of prosperity.”
Edward Gibbon's 'The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' is wrong!
How Empires Prosper and Fall
A fun, fresh, and sophisticated comparison of Roman and modern history.
Peter Heather and John Rapley refute Edward Gibbon's The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, which remains the most important work in analyzing the causes of Rome's fall both inside and outside academia, from both economic and cultural perspectives.
First, on the economic side, Gibbon argued that the Roman Empire experienced a slow and long economic decline from its golden age in the 2nd century to its inevitable collapse in the 5th century, but this was not true.
According to recent archaeological research, the gross economic output of almost all settlements actually peaked in the 4th century, just before the empire's political collapse.
This is a chilling message for the West, which enjoyed peak prosperity until the end of the 20th century and is only now beginning to show economic decline in the 21st century.
This means that if we do not make the right political and economic choices now, we could soon collapse like the Roman Empire.
From a cultural perspective, Gibbon argued that the introduction of Christianity undermined the Roman Empire's characteristic belligerence, caused internal divisions, and diminished its economic vitality.
Some Western leaders, including Donald Trump and Boris Johnson, have erected high barriers to immigration, seemingly inspired by The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. However, consistent research since the 1950s has shown that there is little historical evidence to support Gibbon's claims.
Rather, Christianity enabled Rome to achieve cultural integration while ruling its vast empire.
Meanwhile, the authors argue that while 'barbarian' invasions were clearly a powerful threat to the Roman Empire, modern immigration has been an economic boon to the West.
Immigrants are supporting the labor force and public services that have been left vacant due to the aging population and low birth rate.
The authors cite Japan's immigration policy as the basis for their argument, which has stalled economic growth for a long time.
The two authors do not only focus on the differences between Roman history and modern history.
In chapters 3 and 4, the authors describe the changing relationship between the empire and its periphery as a result of the flow of wealth.
The description comparing Rome, which relied on land transport, with the modern West, which is connected by sea routes and railways, is very sophisticated and interesting.
The West, which has used its dense trade networks to move its production plants further and further afield in search of cheap labor, is facing a significant challenge from the Third World, a challenge that bears a striking resemblance to what the Roman Empire faced as its periphery grew economically.
Chapters 5 and 6 compare the external shock of the Huns' expansion to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The authors also argue that the former Soviet Union was not a true competitor to the United States during the Cold War, and that the United States' strategic line, which finally faced a competitor called China, can be traced back to the temporary cooperative relationship between the Roman Empire and Persia.
Is it a fire across the river, or a fire that spread by boat?
Low growth, low birth rates, anti-immigrant sentiment, a shrinking technology gap…
Why Korea is not free from the problems of Western empires
Translator Lee Seong-min states in the “Translator’s Preface” that the problems of the West are also occurring at a rapid pace in Korea.
It is a well-known fact that Korea has the lowest birth rate in the world.
The conflict between indigenous people and immigrants is more explicit in Korea.
The technology gap in industries where Korea was a leader is rapidly narrowing.
Korea is no exception to external shocks such as climate change.
Moreover, Korea must play a mediating role in the US-China hegemony competition.
This is why we cannot just watch the problems of the West unfold.
There is an English expression, “History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes.”
"Why Empires Fall" offers a broad perspective on the recurring modern history, rhyming with Roman history, and the rapidly changing global economy.
“Besides its practical utility, this book has another gift.
It is an insight that penetrates time and space and an expansion of the perspective that understands the present age.
Just as climbing a high mountain allows you to see things you couldn't see from a small path, this book, "Why Empires Fall," allows you to broadly compare the two important historical periods of 399 and 1999."
From the Translator's Preface
GOODS SPECIFICS
- Date of issue: July 5, 2024
- Page count, weight, size: 264 pages | 432g | 145*210*16mm
- ISBN13: 9788962624359
You may also like
카테고리
korean
korean