We explore the potential human rights violations that artificial intelligence technology may cause and explore solutions from various angles.
It reminds us again that technological advancement should never compromise human dignity.
Artificial Intelligence Encyclopedia.
You can find the artificial intelligence knowledge you need at aiseries.oopy.io.

I feel like we are entering an era of technology that is completely different from the one where AI takes away human jobs and makes professional professions disappear.
Many scientists still say that there is a long way to go before AI with a 'mind' is created.
But despite the good news that AI technology will bring a bright future, that a new industrial revolution for future generations is just around the corner, is it only the general public, especially the socially disadvantaged and minorities, who feel a sense of foreboding?
--- From "01_Human Rights in the AI ​​Era"

In 2017, a UK health trust shared the data of 1.6 million patients with Google DeepMind without their proper consent, and from 2013 to 2018, Cambridge Analytica harvested the personal data of up to 87 million Facebook users without their knowledge or consent for use in political advertising. The practice of using publicly available images to create AI facial recognition databases is already well known.
A technology that uses a database of 10 billion images collected from the internet for law enforcement purposes has been found to violate privacy laws in several countries, including Australia, Canada, France and the UK.
--- From "03_AI and Civil Rights: Right to Self-Determination of Information, Copyright"

Researchers at Pennsylvania State University's Department of Information Science and Technology (IST) announced in December 2023 that social media services could have a negative impact on AI bias against people with disabilities.
The researchers demonstrated that not only intentional biases but also unconscious negative stereotypes about people with disabilities can be learned.
Furthermore, the research team conducted research on how 'online communities' can negatively impact the bias of natural language processing (NLP) AI models.
As a result, AI trained on posts and comments in online communities showed a much more negative bias toward disabilities.
“All the AI ​​models we studied categorized sentences as negative and harmful when disability-related terms like ‘blind’ were included, without considering the contextual meaning,” said Venkit IST researcher. “This shows an explicit bias against disability-related terms.”
--- From "06_AI and the Human Rights of Persons with Disabilities"

In her 2021 “Report on the Right to Privacy in the Digital Age,” the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights recommended “systematic human rights due diligence throughout the life cycle of the design, development, deployment, sale, purchase, and operation of AI systems,” emphasizing “human rights impact assessments” as a key element of human rights due diligence.
The National Human Rights Commission of Korea also expressed its opinion to the Minister of Science and ICT in May 2024 that the "AI Human Rights Impact Assessment Tool" should be utilized when establishing and implementing related policies and business plans to prevent human rights violations and discrimination resulting from the development and use of AI, and that the tool should be disseminated so that autonomous human rights impact assessments can be conducted on all AI directly developed or utilized by public institutions and high-risk AI in the private sector until the human rights impact assessment is legislated.

--- From "09_Domestic Efforts for Guaranteed Standards"